PEGACPRSA22V1 Exam Dumps - Certified Pega Robotics System Architect 22

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Pega Robotics System Exact Extract:

According to Pega Robotics Studio – Matching and Interrogation Tools Documentation:

“Matching defines how a control is identified at runtime. When application hierarchies change or specific match rules fail, Robot Studio provides diagnostic tools to reestablish and verify the correct control associations.”

The guide specifies the following tools and their purpose:

Refresh Matching

“Refresh Matching updates the control’s properties and hierarchy information based on the current application structure without re-interrogating the control. This tool is useful when an application’s DOM or hierarchy has changed.”

Debug Matching

“Debug Matching opens the Match Rules Diagnostics window and evaluates each match rule in real-time to show which rules pass or fail. It assists in identifying which match rule must be corrected or replaced.”

By contrast:

Replace Matching – Recreates the match rules from scratch (not the preferred first step).

Replace Control – Reinterrogates the entire control and removes existing references (used only when the control is entirely invalid).

Debug Control – Analyzes properties but not matching logic.

Thus, the two correct tools to address the described issues are:

Refresh Matching (for hierarchy change)

Debug Matching (for failed rule troubleshooting)

References (Exact Extract Source):

Pega Robotics Studio – Matching Diagnostics and Interrogation Guide

Pega Robotics System Architect Training – Debugging and Refresh Matching Modules

Pega Robotics Help – Managing Match Rules in Chrome/Edge/Web Adapters

Final Verified Answer: A, C

Pega Robotics Studio – Automation Design Concepts (Events and UI Responsiveness)

“Automations started from a Windows Form Click event run on the UI thread. To keep the form responsive, long-running work should be started by calling other automations asynchronously. When an automation is executed synchronously, the UI thread is blocked until the call completes. Executing the child automation asynchronously allows users to continue interacting with the form.”

Pega Robotics Studio – Calling Automations (Run method)

“The Run method includes a synchronous parameter.

True – the caller waits for completion (blocks the UI).

False – the automation starts asynchronously and control returns immediately to the caller (UI remains available).

Default follows the project setting.”

Pega Robotics Studio – Windows Form Controls (Avoid self-triggering)

“Invoking PerformClick from within an automation that is already handling the button’s click should be avoided. It re-triggers the button click and can lead to reentrancy or recursion and does not improve UI responsiveness.”

Pega Robotics Studio – Message Dialogs

“Displaying a MessageDialog during processing is modal and prevents interaction with the form until the dialog is closed. Use only for completion or error notifications, not while long-running work is executing.”

Why Option B is correct:

Option B starts from the btnUpdateAccount.Click event (so no self-trigger via PerformClick).

It launches the downstream automations (UpdateBankerInsight and UpdatePegasFinance) using Run with the synchronous parameter set to False (asynchronous), which keeps the Windows form responsive and accessible to the user while updates run.

It does not introduce a modal MessageBox before or during the updates (dialogs are only used for completion/notification), so it avoids blocking the UI.

Why the other options are not correct:

Option A: Uses PerformClick on the button, which re-triggers the click and can lead to recursion without improving responsiveness.

Option C: Inserts a MessageDialog during the middle of processing, which is modal and blocks the form.

Option D: Calls the update automations synchronously (or leaves them at the blocking default), which holds the UI thread until completion and makes the form inaccessible during the run.