NSK300 Exam Dumps - Netskope Certified Cloud Security Architect Exam

• A. Import the root certificate for your internal certificate authority into Netskope:
• B. Bypass SSL inspection for the affected site(s):
• D. Change the SSL Error Settings from Block to Bypass in the Netskope tenant:
• Netskope Security Cloud Introductory Online Technical Training
• Netskope Security Cloud Operation & Administration (NSCO&A) - Classroom Training
• Netskope Cloud Security Certification Program

To solve the problem of normal websites not rendering properly due to a Real-time Protection policy that blocks all activities to non-corporate S3 buckets, the best solution is to create a Real-time Protection policy to allow the Browse activity to the Cloud Storage category. This approach will enable users to view content from various cloud storage services, including Amazon S3, without allowing full access to non-corporate S3 buckets. It’s a more granular and less restrictive policy that allows necessary browsing activities while still maintaining control over the upload and download activities to non-corporate buckets1.

References: The Netskope Knowledge Portal provides information on how to configure Real-time Protection policies, including how to set up policies that allow certain activities while blocking others1. Additionally, the Netskope Community Forum offers insights into best practices for policy configuration to avoid overly restrictive rules that can impact normal web browsing

In the given scenario, a user is attempting to upload a file containing sensitive PII and PCI data to Microsoft OneDrive. The Netskope Security Cloud provides real-time data and threat protection when accessing cloud services, websites, and private apps from anywhere, on any device. Based on the exhibit provided, different DLP (Data Loss Prevention) profiles are triggered - DLP-SourceCode, DLP-PCI, and DLP-PII. Each of these profiles has specific actions associated with them; for instance, an alert is generated for Source Code while blocking actions are initiated for PCI and PII data. Since multiple DLP profiles are triggered due to the sensitive nature of the content in the file being uploaded, separate incidents will be generated for each matching profile ensuring comprehensive security coverage and incident reporting.

References:

• Netskope Cloud Security
• Netskope Resources
• Netskope Documentation

The issue is likely caused bya missing group name in the SAML response (A). When access to Microsoft 365 from unmanaged devices is not blocked as expected, despite having a policy in place, it often indicates that the SAML assertion is not correctly identifying the user as a member of the restricted group. In this case, the “marketing-users” group name should be present in the SAML response to enforce the policy that blocks login activity for this group. If the group name is missing, the policy will not apply, and users will not be blocked as intended.

References: This explanation is consistent with the configuration requirements for access control using SAML responses, as detailed in Netskope’s documentation on Reverse Proxy and SAML integration1.

When applications steered through an IPsec tunnel are non-functional, it is often due to the lack of proper trust establishment between the end-user devices and the Netskope data plane. The solution is to install the Netskope root and intermediate certificates on the end-user devices ©. This ensures that the devices recognize and trust the encrypted connection established by the IPsec tunnel, allowing the HTTPS SaaS applications to function correctly. Without these certificates, the devices may not be able to verify the security of the connection, leading to application failures.

References: This solution is based on standard practices for securing IPsec tunnels and ensuring device compatibility with encrypted traffic steering, as outlined in Netskope’s documentation on traffic steering and IPsec configuration

The correct query to use in the Edit Widget window to narrow down the results is option A: “app-ccl-compliance-cert neq ‘HIPAA’ and category eq ‘Cloud Storage’”. This query filters out applications that are not HIPAA compliant and belong to the Cloud Storage category, ensuring that only non-HIPAA compliant cloud storage applications are displayed in the results. This helps in identifying and blocking such applications as per the manager’s request without affecting business or departmental applications. It aligns with Netskope’s capabilities to enforce controls and restrictions on high-risk cloud services to help address HIPAA and HITECH compliance, as well as to audit suspected violations with a full cloud and web activity trail1.

References: The reference for constructing such queries can be found in Netskope’s official documentation, which provides detailed information on filtering application data to manage compliance findings and view security posture compliance2. Additionally, Netskope’s resources on HIPAA Cloud Compliance and Risk Insights can be used to understand the compliance and data center certifications related to HIPAA

When designing a policy for AWS S3 bucket scans with a custom DLP profile in Netskope, the available policy actions areAlertandQuarantine. These actions allow you to be notified when a policy violation occurs and to quarantine sensitive data to prevent potential data loss or exposure. TheAlertaction will notify the designated personnel or system when a match to the DLP profile is found during the scan.TheQuarantineaction will move the offending file to a secure location where it can be reviewed and dealt with appropriately1.

References: The information about policy actions for AWS S3 bucket scans is available in the Netskope documentation, which provides guidance on creating API Data Protection policies for scanning S3 buckets and the actions that can be taken when a policy is triggered1.

In Netskope Cloud Security, to block uploads of password-protected files, you should add the file profile to a DLP (Data Loss Prevention) profile that is used in a Real-time Protection policy. The DLP profiles in Netskope are designed to detect and protect sensitive data in real-time and at rest across the cloud environment. This approachensures that any file matching the criteria set in the file profile, such as being password-protected, will trigger the DLP rules and prevent the upload action in real-time.

References: The information aligns with the best practices for setting up DLP profiles in Netskope as described in their documentation and resources

• The issue described in the exhibit is that banking websites are still being inspected despite creating an SSL decryption policy to bypass the inspection of financial and accounting web categories.
• Possible Causes:
• Solution:

To extract events and alerts from the Netskope Security Cloud platform and integrate them with a SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) solution, you can utilize the following supported methods:

• Cloud Log Shipper (CLS):

The three potential reasons for the failure of a new user not being provisioned to Netskope an hour after being added to the domain could be:

• B. The server that the Directory Importer is installed on is unable to reach Netskope’s add-on endpoint: If the server cannot connect to Netskope’s endpoint, it cannot sync the user data. This could be due to network issues, incorrect configuration, or firewall restrictions1.
• C. The user is not a member of the group specified as a filter: The Directory Importer may be configured to import users from specific groups only. If the new user is not a member of these groups, they will not be imported into Netskope1.
• E. The default collection interval is 180 minutes, therefore a sync may not have run yet: The Directory Importer may be scheduled to sync every 180 minutes. If only an hour has passed, the sync process might not have occurred yet, and the user would not be provisioned until the next sync interval1.

References: These potential reasons are based on the standard operation and configuration of the Netskope Directory Importer as described in the Netskope Knowledge Portal and documentation

When integrating a third-party Data Loss Prevention (DLP) engine that requires ICAP, the Netskope platform component that must be configured is the Netskope Adapter. The Netskope Adapter is designed to facilitate the integration of Netskope with various third-party tools and services, including DLP engines that use ICAP for communication. By configuring the Netskope Adapter, you can ensure that the third-party DLP engine can communicate effectively with the Netskope platform to provide comprehensive data protection.

References: This information is based on the integration capabilities of the Netskope platform, which includes the use of Netskope Adapters for third-party integrations as detailed in the Netskope Knowledge Portal1 and the Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) documentation2

To allow access from company-managed devices running the Netskope Client to only Amazon S3 buckets owned by the organization, the following configuration satisfies the requirements:

• Steering Configuration:

• By configuring the policy to allow traffic from company-managed devices (Netskope Clients) to Amazon S3 buckets, the organization ensures that only buckets owned by the organization are accessible.
• The -ALLAccounts condition ensures that both existing and future buckets are allowed.
• This configuration aligns with the requirement to allow access to organization-owned buckets while blocking access to other buckets.

References:

• Netskope Cloud Security
• Netskope Solution Brief
• Netskope Community

When using Netskope’s API-enabled Protection for supported SaaS applications, the valid instance types are:

• API Data Protection (B): This type is used to connect to cloud apps using APIs to find sensitive content, enforce policy controls, and quarantine malware1.
• DLP Scan (D): This instance type involves scanning for data loss prevention, which is a key component of Netskope’s API Data Protection1.
• Quarantine (E): This instance type allows for the isolation of potentially harmful or sensitive data until it can be reviewed or remediated1.

Behavior Analytics © and Forensic (A) are not listed as instance types for API-enabled Protection in the provided resources.

References: The answers are based on the information available in the Netskope Knowledge Portal and the documentation for Classic API Data Protection

When using IPsec tunnels, especially in the context of deploying Netskope for on-premises devices, several factors must be considered to ensure a secure and efficient architecture:

• Cipher support on tunnel-initiating devices (A): It is crucial to ensure that the devices initiating the IPsec tunnels support the ciphers used by Netskope. This compatibility is necessary for establishing secure connections.
• Bandwidth considerations (B): The bandwidth available for the IPsec tunnels will affect the data throughput and performance of the connection. Adequate bandwidth must be allocated to handle the expected traffic without causing bottlenecks.
• The impact of threat scanning performance (D): The performance of threat scanning can be affected by the encryption and decryption processes in IPsec tunnels. It is important to consider how the threat scanning capabilities will perform under the additional load of encrypted traffic.

These elements are essential for the successful implementation of IPsec tunnels in a Netskope architecture plan for on-premises devices12.

References: The considerations for using IPsec tunnels are outlined in the Netskope Knowledge Portal and Community discussions, which provide guidance on deployment and validation of IPsec tunnels, including cipher support, bandwidth management, and maintaining threat scanning performance