NSE6_SDW_AD-7.6 Exam Dumps - Fortinet NSE 6 - SD-WAN 7.6 Enterprise Administrator

Your requirements map to two key MSSP goals described in the FCSS SD-WAN 7.6 blueprint patterns:

Delegate as much administration and management as possible to the MSSP This is best achieved when the hub security and SD-WAN control point is located on the MSSP premises , because the MSSP can centrally operate the core enforcement and overlay control. Both option B (dedicated hub at MSSP) and option D (shared hub at MSSP with customer isolation) meet this requirement.

Each site must maintain direct internet access (DIA) and be secure, with significant site-to-site traffic In Fortinet SD-WAN MSSP designs, spokes can still use local breakout for DIA while also building secure overlays for inter-site traffic. Placing the hub at the MSSP enables centralized security services and scalable inter-site connectivity management while preserving DIA where required. Options B and D support this operating model.

Why the other options do not best match:

A includes a dedicated hub on the customer premises , which reduces how much the MSSP can centralize and operate from its own environment, so it does not maximize delegation.

C places both hub and spokes on the customer premises . While the MSSP can manage using a dedicated ADOM, this blueprint does not align as strongly with “delegate installation and management” to the MSSP as the designs where the hub is hosted and operated from the MSSP premises.

Therefore, the two MSSP deployment blueprints that address your requirements are B and D .

In an SD-WAN rule, you can steer application traffic by using Internet Service Database (ISDB) entries. Facebook and LinkedIn are predefined ISDB objects in FortiGate, so the correct way is to select them in the Internet service field under Destination. This ensures that all traffic to these applications is matched and routed through the chosen (less costly) link.

In FortiOS 7.6, static routes can reference either:

an SD-WAN zone (for example, virtual-wan-link or a user-defined SD-WAN zone), or

a specific SD-WAN member interface that belongs to that zone.

However, FortiOS enforces a routing constraint to avoid ambiguity during route resolution. Two static routes cannot have the same destination prefix if one points to an SD-WAN zone and the other points to an SD-WAN member within that zone . This would create an overlapping and conflicting forwarding decision.

Therefore, if you configure:

one static route that references an SD-WAN zone, and

another static route that references an SD-WAN member belonging to that same zone,

the destination subnets of the two static routes must be different .

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A is incorrect because FortiOS does allow static routes that reference individual SD-WAN members.

Option B is incorrect because static routes can reference SD-WAN zones.

Option D is incorrect because static routing decisions in FortiOS are based on destination prefixes, not source prefixes.

Thus, the correct answer is C .

FortiManager enforces a strict distinction:

" Firewall policies must reference SD-WAN zones, not individual SD-WAN members, when used in conjunction with SD-WAN templates. Attempting to install a policy that references a specific member (interface) will result in a deployment error, as member-level targeting is not supported in SD-WAN policy abstraction. This enforces centralized policy consistency and proper SD-WAN operation. "

Ensuring policies target zones allows FortiGate to dynamically select the optimal member.

From the SD-WAN service configuration , rule edit 3 (name " Corp " ) is configured with:

set mode sla

set load-balance enable

set dst " Corp-net "

set src " LAN-net "

SLA checks referenced under config sla

Traffic from 10.0.1.101 to 10.0.0.126 matches this rule because the destination is within the corporate network range (shown in the policy-route/proute output as destination 10.0.0.0–10.255.255.255 for the Corp service).

In the diagnose firewall proute list output for vwl_service=3 (Corp) , FortiGate shows which SD-WAN members are eligible based on SLA pass results:

oif=21 (HUB1-VPN3) num_pass=2

oif=20 (HUB1-VPN2) num_pass=0

oif=19 (HUB1-VPN1) num_pass=0

This indicates that, for the SLA-based rule, only HUB1-VPN3 is meeting the SLA requirements (it is the only member with num_pass=2). The other members have num_pass=0, so they are not eligible for forwarding under this SLA rule even though links are up.

The sniffer trace further corroborates the forwarding decision by showing the traffic egressing through HUB1-VPN3 .

Therefore, FortiGate will steer the HTTP traffic through only HUB1-VPN3 , which corresponds to Option A .

The session details show the symmetric flow’s original direction as port3 → port2.

The asymmetric flow’s reply direction is listed as port2 → port3.