DevOps-SRE Exam Dumps - Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) Foundation v1.2

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

SRE is built on transparency and broad information sharing. The SRE Book states: “High-quality operations require that information flows freely between product development, SRE, and associated teams.” (SRE Book – Chapter: Communication and Collaboration). Effective incident management also depends on complete data availability: “Centralized, shared information reduces cognitive load and improves incident resolution.” (SRE Workbook – Incident Management).

Option B aligns perfectly with SRE principles: data must flow freely, ensuring everyone has access to metrics, logs, architecture details, incident context, and SLOs.

Options A, C, and D promote restricted or fragmented data practices, which are directly contrary to SRE design. SRE teams avoid information silos.

Thus, B is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A Business Continuity Plan (BCP) is a critical component of organizational resilience. While not unique to SRE, SRE strongly intersects with continuity planning because reliable systems must continue functioning during disruptions. According to Google’s SRE principles, reliability extends beyond typical outages and includes “ensuring services continue to operate even under exceptional conditions.” (SRE Book – Chapter: Addressing Risks). A business continuity plan specifically outlines how essential operations are maintained during major disruptions such as natural disasters, data center outages, or large-scale system failures.

Option A—“The way the organization maintains operations during a disaster”—matches the formal definition of BCP.

Option B refers to disaster recovery (DR), which is separate; DR focuses on restoring systems, not maintaining ongoing operations.

Option C refers to configuration management activities, not continuity.

Option D refers to risk management, which informs BCP but does not define it.

Therefore, A is the correct answer because it directly reflects the purpose of continuity planning as supported by reliability-focused guidance.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The Slice-and-Dice model is an SRE adoption pattern where the SRE team owns specific portions of a service—typically the most critical, complex, or high-risk components—while development teams own the rest.

From the SRE Workbook, Organizational Models section:

“In the slice-and-dice model, SREs take responsibility for particular portions of a service or system rather than owning the entire thing. This works well when parts of the system require stronger reliability engineering than others.”

This model is used when:

Services are large or complex

Only certain components need SRE-level reliability

Full SRE ownership is not feasible

Why the other options are incorrect:

A Consultant → SREs advise; they do not own components

B Full → SRE fully owns the entire service

D Platform → SRE builds shared reliability tooling, not owning service slices

Thus, C. Slice and dice is the correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

When a team exceeds its error budget, SRE practice requires applying error budget policies that restrict feature releases and shift focus toward reliability improvement. The idea is to prevent further degradation of user experience and ensure the service meets the agreed reliability targets.

The Site Reliability Engineering Book, Chapter “Service Level Objectives,” states:

“If the service exceeds its error budget, all new feature launches or risky changes are halted until reliability returns to acceptable levels. Engineering work should be directed toward addressing the causes of the budget overrun.”

This aligns with option A, which describes a reliability-focused response during sprint planning. Limiting sprint planning to post-mortem action items and reliability improvements is a direct application of error budget policies.

Additional guidance from the SRE Workbook:

“Error budget burn should directly influence decision-making. When the budget is exhausted, the team must focus on remediation work rather than new features.”

Why the other options are incorrect:

B Reviewing the error budget’s realism can be done periodically, but it is not the immediate consequence of a breach.

C Extending the error budget invalidates its purpose and is discouraged.

D Ignoring the error budget contradicts the entire SRE model and Google’s official guidance.

Therefore, A is the only correct answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

One of the central goals of SRE is that operational work must scale sublinearly with service growth. The SRE Book states: “If operational load grows linearly with service size, the model is unsustainable. Eliminating toil is key to scaling operations.” (SRE Book – Chapter: Eliminating Toil). Toil prevents scaling because it is manual, repetitive, and tied directly to human effort.

Option C is the only answer that reflects this principle: reducing or eliminating toil enables SRE teams to support growing applications without increasing human labor proportionally.

Option A (staffing levels) does not scale sustainably.

Option B (interruptions) relate to productivity but not true scalability.

Option D (on-call rotations) affects fatigue, not the scaling of operational work.

Thus, C is the correct and SRE-authentic answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

SRE emphasizes organizational alignment and collaboration, warning against siloed thinking. The SRE Book highlights: “Local optimizations at the expense of the broader system lead to inefficiency, misalignment, and reduced reliability.” When individuals or teams focus only on their own “parts” instead of shared goals (“the whole”), it results in decreased cross-team communication, isolation, operational friction, and reduced efficiency.

Option B captures this SRE-documented outcome: increased introversion (siloing) and decreased efficiency.

Option A and D describe positive outcomes that contradict SRE principles of collaboration.

Option C implies healthy sharing, which does not result from silo-first behavior.

Thus, B is correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Google’s definition is explicit: “An SLI is a carefully defined QUANTITATIVE measure of some aspect of the level of service provided.” (SRE Book – Chapter: Service Level Objectives). Examples include error rate, latency, throughput, and availability. SLIs are measurements, not targets—targets are SLOs.

Option D repeats Google’s definition almost exactly.

Option C incorrectly describes an SLO (a target), not an SLI.

Options A and B mention subjective assessments—SRE explicitly rejects subjectivity in measurement, stating: “SLIs must be objective and measurable.”

Thus, D is the correct and SRE-authentic answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The Westrum Organizational Culture Model categorizes organizations based on how effectively they allow information to flow, particularly in high-risk and high-performance environments. This model is widely referenced in SRE and DevOps practices and is cited by Google in their SRE culture guidance.

The Westrum model identifies three culture types:

Pathological (power-oriented)

Bureaucratic (rule-oriented)

Generative (performance-oriented)

From the SRE Workbook and Google’s DevOps Research (DORA):

“The Westrum model is a taxonomy of organizational cultures based on how information flows. Generative cultures—with high cooperation and open information flow—correlate with higher reliability and better outcomes.”

Why the other options are incorrect:

A Deployment frequency is a DORA metric, not Westrum’s focus.

C Resource flow is unrelated to Westrum.

D While communication affects design, Westrum specifically studies information flow as a cultural health indicator, not structural design.

Thus, the correct answer is B.