CGEIT Exam Dumps - Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, in its Risk Optimization domain, underscores the CIO’s role in managing risks associated with new technology deployments. Rapid adoption of a mobile application introduces risks (e.g., security vulnerabilities, integration issues), which the CIO must prioritize to protect the enterprise. Ensuring risk is properly managed involves risk assessments, mitigation plans, and compliance checks (e.g., for data privacy). The manual likely references COBIT 2019’s APO12-Managed Risk, which emphasizes risk management for new IT initiatives.

Option A: Metrics for usage are important but secondary to risk management during implementation.

Option B: Business unit awareness is a communication task, not the CIO’s main responsibility.

Option C: EA review is relevant but less urgent than addressing immediate implementation risks.

Double Verification: The answer aligns with COBIT’s APO12 and the CGEIT domain’s focus on risk management for new technologies. Risk management is a core CIO responsibility in ISACA’s frameworks.

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 4: Risk Optimization (focus on technology implementation risks).

COBIT 2019, APO12-Managed Risk.

ISACA Glossary (for definitions of risk management), available at https://www.isaca.org/resources/glossary.

 A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a process that’s used to estimate the costs and benefits of projects or investments to determine their profitability for an organization. A CBA is a versatile method that’s often used for business administration, project management and public policy decisions1. A CBA can help the CIO prioritize the improvement initiatives based on theirexpected value and feasibility, and justify the allocation of resources and funding for them. A CBA can also align the IT goals with the enterprise objectives and demonstrate the IT value delivery to the stakeholders2. References :=

2: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA

1: Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Quick Guide with Examples and Templates

The most important thing for a data steward to verify when a system’s data is edited by an automated tool to fix an incident is that the change maintains consistency among databases and has no other impacts. Data consistency is a dimension of data quality that describes the data’s uniformity as it moves across applications and networks and when it comes from multiple sources1. Data is considered consistent if two or more values in different locations are identical and do not conflict1. Data consistency is related to data integrity and data currency1. To ensure data consistency, some steps include data governance, automated data integration, and regular data audits and quality control checks1. If the automated tool changes the data in one database, but not in others, it can create inconsistencies and errors that affect the reliability and usability of the data. Similarly, if the automated tool changes the data in a way that affects other processes or systems that depend on the data, it can cause disruptions and failures that impact the business operations and performance. Therefore, the data steward should verify that the change is consistent and has no other impacts before approving it.

The other options are not as important as verifying the data consistency and impact of the change. Requesting and approving the change by the business department and the data owner is a good practice, but not a verification step. Documenting the change in preparation for future audits is a necessary step, but not a verification step. Addressing the permanent solution for the incident by problem management is a relevant step, but not a verification step. References := What is Data Quality - Definition, Dimensions … - Simplilearn

To prevent an IT system from becoming obsolete before achieving its planned return on investment (ROI), it is crucial to manage the benefit realization throughout the entire lifecycle of the system. This approach involves continuously monitoring and adjusting the system to ensure it delivers the expected value and benefits from inception through decommissioning. This proactive management helps in adapting to changes in technology and business environments, thus extending the relevance and utility of the IT system. Obtaining independent assurance,defining IT and business goals, and ordering an external audit are important practices but do not directly address the ongoing management of the system's value delivery and adaptability over time.

Changes to the IT strategy must consider their impact on the enterprise architecture (EA), as the EA defines the structure and standards that enable strategy execution. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition highlights that assessing EA impact is the greatest consideration to ensure that strategic changes are feasible and sustainable.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 4: Strategic Management):"When modifying the IT strategy, the CIO’s greatest consideration is assessing the impact on the enterprise architecture, as the EA provides the blueprint for IT capabilities, processes, and standards. Misalignment with EA can lead to implementation challenges and reduced effectiveness." (Approximate reference: Domain 4, Section on Strategy and EA Alignment)

Assessing the impact to the enterprise architecture (option B) ensures that the IT strategy leverages existing capabilities and addresses any architectural gaps, making it the most critical consideration.

Why not the other options?

A. Have key stakeholders been consulted?: Stakeholder consultation is important but secondary to ensuring the strategy is technically feasible via EA alignment.

C. Have IT risk metrics been adjusted?: Risk metrics are adjusted as part of risk management, not the primary concern for strategy changes.

D. Has the investment portfolio been revised?: Portfolio revision follows strategy and EA alignment to ensure investments support the updated strategy.

Outsourcing IT services requires a clear distinction between core and non-core processes to ensure that strategic capabilities are retained in-house while non-core activities are outsourced. The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition highlights that identifying core and non-core processes is the most essential consideration for outsourcing decisions.

Extract from CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition (Domain 5: Benefits Realization):"The most critical consideration in outsourcing IT services is identifying core and non-core business processes. Core processes, which provide competitive advantage, should typically be retained, while non-core processes can be outsourced to improve efficiency and focus on strategic priorities." (Approximate reference: Domain 5, Section on Outsourcing Strategy)

Identification of core and non-core business processes (option A) ensures that outsourcing aligns with the enterprise’s strategic goals and avoids compromising critical capabilities.

Why not the other options?

B. Compliance with enterprise architecture (EA): EA compliance is important but secondary to determining what processes should be outsourced.

C. Alignment with existing human resources (HR) policies and practices: HR alignment is operational and less critical than strategic process identification.

D. Adoption of a diverse vendor selection process: Vendor selection follows the decision to outsource and is not the primary consideration.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, in its Governance of Enterprise IT domain, addresses data governance to ensure proper management and protection of data, including third-party data. Establishing data ownership with clear accountabilities ensures that specific individuals or roles are responsible for overseeing third-party data, preventing unauthorized use through defined policies and controls. For example, a data owner can enforce access restrictions and monitor usage. The manual likely references COBIT 2019’s APO14-Managed Data, which emphasizes data ownership for governance.

Option A: Communicate consequences is reactive and less effective than proactive ownership.

Option B: Encrypt data in transit addresses security but not unauthorized internal use.

Option D: Retention periods manage data lifecycle but don’t directly prevent misuse.

Double Verification: The answer aligns with COBIT’s APO14 and the CGEIT domain’s focus on data governance. Data ownership is a core ISACA principle for data protection.

ISACA CGEIT Review Manual 8th Edition, Domain 1: Governance of Enterprise IT (focus on data governance).

COBIT 2019, APO14-Managed Data.

ISACA Glossary (for definitions of data ownership), available at https://www.isaca.org/resources/glossary.

Standardization of technical platforms can help optimize infrastructure investments by reducing complexity, increasing interoperability, and enabling economies of scale.