CDPSE Exam Dumps - Certified Data Privacy Solutions Engineer

A primary objective of performing a privacy impact assessment (PIA) prior to onboarding a new Software as a Service (SaaS) provider for a customer relationship management (CRM) system is to identify controls to mitigate data privacy risks, such as data breaches, unauthorized access, misuse or loss of data. A PIA would help to evaluate the potential privacy impacts of using a new SaaS provider for CRM data processing activities, such as collecting, storing, analyzing or transferring customer data, and to implement appropriate controls to mitigate those impacts, such as encryption, access control, backup, audit trail or contractual clauses. A PIA would also help to ensure compliance with privacy principles, laws and regulations, and alignment with customer expectations and preferences. The other options are not primary objectives of performing a PIA prior to onboarding a new SaaS provider for CRM data processing activities. Classifying personal data according to the data classification scheme is an activity that may be part of a PIA process, but it is not an objective in itself. Assessing the risk associated with personal data usage is an activity that may be part of a PIA process, but it is not an objective in itself. Determining the service provider’s ability to maintain data protection controls is an activity that may be part of a PIA process, but it is not an objective in itself1, p. 67 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

Mandatory access control (MAC) is a security model where access to data is determined by labels and clearances. In a data warehouse, MAC can be used to mask or hide specific data within a larger database based on a user's security level. This ensures that users only see the data they are authorized to access.

User behavior analytics tools are the best control to detect potential internal breaches of personal data because they monitor and analyze the activities and patterns of users on the network and systems, and alert or block any anomalous or suspicious behavior that may indicate unauthorized access, misuse or exfiltration of personal data. Data loss prevention (DLP) systems, employee background checks and classification of data are useful controls to prevent or mitigate internal breaches of personal data, but they do not necessarily detect them.

A third-party privacy control assessment is an independent and objective evaluation of the design and effectiveness of the privacy controls implemented by an organization to protect personal data and comply with privacy laws and regulations. A third-party privacy control assessment can help senior management to verify the success of its commitment to privacy by design, by providing the following benefits:

It can measure the extent to which the organization has adopted and integrated the principles and practices of privacy by design throughout its products, services, processes and systems.

It can identify the strengths and weaknesses of the organization’s privacy governance, policies, procedures, standards and guidelines, and provide recommendations for improvement.

It can validate the organization’s compliance with the applicable privacy requirements and expectations of its customers, stakeholders, regulators and auditors.

It can enhance the organization’s reputation and trustworthiness as a responsible and transparent data controller and processor.

The other options are less effective or irrelevant for verifying the success of the commitment to privacy by design. Reviewing the findings of an industry benchmarking assessment may provide some insights into how the organization compares with its peers or competitors in terms of privacy performance, but it may not reflect the specific privacy goals, risks and challenges of the organization. Identifying trends in the organization’s amount of compromised personal data or number of privacy incidents may indicate some aspects of the organization’s privacy maturity, but they are reactive and lagging indicators that do not capture the proactive and preventive nature of privacy by design. Moreover, these metrics may not account for other factors that may influence the occurrence or impact of data breaches or privacy violations, such as external threats, human errors or environmental changes.

The best way to address privacy concerns when an organization captures personal data from a third party through an open application programming interface (API) is to obtain consent from the data subjects. Consent is a freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous indication of the data subject’s wishes by which they agree to the processing of their personal data by the organization for a defined purpose. Consent is one of the legal bases for processing personal data under various privacy laws and regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). Obtaining consent from the data subjects can help ensure that they are aware of and agree to the collection and use of their personal data by the organization through the open API. Obtaining consent can also help respect the data subject’s rights and preferences regarding their personal data.

Developing a service level agreement (SLA) with the third party, implementing encryption for the data transmission, or reviewing the specification document of the open API are also good practices for addressing privacy concerns when using an open API to capture personal data from a third party, but they are not the best way. Developing an SLA with the third party can help define the roles, responsibilities, expectations, and obligations of both parties regarding the provision and use of the open API and the personal data involved. Implementing encryption for the data transmission can help protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the personal data transferred between the third party and the organization through the open API. Reviewing the specification document of the open API can help understand the functionality, features, parameters, or requirements of the open API and how it handles personal data.

Incorporating privacy checkpoints into the secure development life cycle (SDLC) is the best way to avoid collecting personal data that was not part of the privacy impact assessment (PIA). Privacy checkpoints are stages in the SDLC where privacy requirements and risks are reviewed and validated, and any changes or deviations from the original PIA are identified and addressed. Privacy checkpoints help ensure that privacy is embedded throughout the system design and development, and that any changes are documented and approved.

 Irreversible disposal is a process of removing or destroying data from a storage device or media to prevent unauthorized access or recovery of the data. Irreversible disposal is the most important thing to establish within a data storage policy to protect data privacy, as it reflects the principles of data minimization and storage limitation, which require limiting the collection, storage and processing of personal data to what is necessary and relevant for the intended purposes, and deleting or disposing of personal data when it is no longer needed or justified. Irreversible disposal also helps to reduce the privacy risks and costs associated with data storage and retention, such as data breaches, unauthorized access, misuse or loss of data. The other options are not as important as irreversible disposal in protecting data privacy within a data storage policy. Data redaction is a technique that removes or obscures sensitive or confidential information from a document or file, but it does not address the issue of data retention or deletion. Data quality assurance (QA) is a process of ensuring that the data meets the standards and specifications of accuracy, completeness, consistency and reliability, but it does not address the issue of data retention or deletion. Collection limitation is a principle that requires limiting the collection of personal data to what is necessary and relevant for the intended purposes, but it does not address the issue of data retention or deletion1, p. 75-76 References: 1: CDPSE Review Manual (Digital Version)

An enterprise architecture (EA) management team ensures technology use is coordinated, reducing duplication and inconsistency that increase privacy risk. A privacy committee (B) sets governance but does not address technical duplication; penetration testing (C) identifies vulnerabilities, not redundancy; training (D) improves awareness but not systemic technology alignment.

“Enterprise architecture ensures consistent, standardized technology deployment, reducing unnecessary duplication and privacy risks.”