ARA-C01 Exam Dumps - SnowPro Advanced: Architect Certification Exam

The AUTO_SUSPEND parameter controls the amount of time, in seconds, of inactivity after which a warehouse is automatically suspended. If the parameter is set to NULL, the warehouse never suspends. If the parameter is set to ‘0’, the warehouse suspends immediately after executing a query. Therefore, the execution behavior of the two virtual warehouses will be different depending on the AUTO_SUSPEND value. The warehouse with NULL value will keep running until it is manually suspended or the resource monitor limits are reached. The warehouse with ‘0’ value will suspend as soon as it finishes a query and release the compute resources. References:

ALTER WAREHOUSE

Parameters

The Snowpipe REST API provides two endpoints for retrieving the data load history: insertReport and loadHistoryScan. The insertReport endpoint returns the status of the files that were submitted to the insertFiles endpoint, while the loadHistoryScan endpoint returns the history of the files that were actually loaded into the table by Snowpipe. To keep a log of data load history, it is recommended to use the loadHistoryScan endpoint, which provides more accurate and complete information about the data ingestion process. The loadHistoryScan endpoint accepts a start time and an end time as parameters, and returns the files that were loaded within that time range. The maximum time range that can be specified is 15 minutes, and the maximum number of files that can be returned is 10,000. Therefore, to keep a log of data load history, the best option is to call the loadHistoryScan endpoint every 10 minutes for a 15-minute time range, and store the results in a log file or a table. This way, the log will capture all the files that were loaded by Snowpipe, and avoid any gaps or overlaps in the time range. The other options are incorrect because:

Calling insertReport every 20 minutes, fetching the last 10,000 entries, will not provide a complete log of data load history, as some files may be missed or duplicated due to the asynchronous nature of Snowpipe. Moreover, insertReport only returns the status of the files that were submitted, not the files that were loaded.

Calling loadHistoryScan every minute for the maximum time range will result in too many API calls and unnecessary overhead, as the same files will be returned multiple times. Moreover, the maximum time range is 15 minutes, not 1 minute.

Calling insertReport every 8 minutes for a 10-minute time range will suffer from the same problems as option A, and also create gaps or overlaps in the time range.

Snowpipe REST API

Option 1: Loading Data Using the Snowpipe REST API

PIPE_USAGE_HISTORY

 The most efficient solution is to ask the partner to create a share and add the company’s account (Option A). This way, the company can access the live data from the partner without any data movement or manual intervention. Snowflake’s secure data sharing feature allows data providers to share selected objects in a database with other Snowflake accounts. The shared data is read-only and does not incur any storage or compute costs for the data consumers. The data consumers can query the shared data directly or create local copies of the shared objects in their own databases. Option B is not efficient because it involves using the data lake export feature, which is intended for exporting data from Snowflake to an external data lake, not for importing data from another Snowflake account. The data lake export feature also requires the data provider to create an external stage on cloud storage and use the COPY INTO <location> command to export the data into parquet files. The data consumer then needs to create an external table or a file format to load the data from the cloud storage into Snowflake. This process can be complex and costly, especially if the data changes frequently. Option C is not efficient because it does not solve the problem of manual data ingestion and adaptation. Keeping the current structure of daily JSON extracts on an FTP server and requesting the partner to stop changing files, instead only appending new files, does not improve the efficiency or reliability of the data ingestion process. The company still needs to upload the data to Snowflake manually and deal with any schema changes or data quality issues. Option D is not efficient because it requires the partner to set up a Snowflake reader account and use that account to get the data for ingestion. A reader account is a special type of account that can only consume data from the provider account that created it. It is intended for data consumers who are not Snowflake customers and do not have a licensing agreement with Snowflake. A reader account is not suitable for data ingestion from another Snowflake account, as it does not allow uploading, modifying, or unloading data. The company would need to use external tools or interfaces to access the data from the reader account and load it into their own account, which can be slow and expensive. References: The answer can be verified from Snowflake’s official documentation on secure data sharing, data lake export, and reader accounts available on their website. Here are some relevant links:

Introduction to Secure Data Sharing | Snowflake Documentation

Data Lake Export Public Preview Is Now Available on Snowflake | Snowflake Blog

Managing Reader Accounts | Snowflake Documentation

This is the best practice recommendation for the order of priority when applications authenticate to Snowflake, according to the Snowflake documentation and the web search results. Authentication is the process of verifying the identity of a user or application that connects to Snowflake. Snowflake supports multiple authentication methods, each with different advantages and disadvantages. The recommended order of priority is based on the following factors:

Security: The authentication method should provide a high level of security and protection against unauthorized access or data breaches. The authentication method should also support multi-factor authentication (MFA) or single sign-on (SSO) for additional security.

Convenience: The authentication method should provide a smooth and easy user experience, without requiring complex or manual steps. The authentication method should also support seamless integration with external identity providers or applications.

Flexibility: The authentication method should provide a range of options and features to suit different use cases and scenarios. The authentication method should also support customization and configuration to meet specific requirements.

Based on these factors, the recommended order of priority is:

OAuth (either Snowflake OAuth or External OAuth): OAuth is an open standard for authorization that allows applications to access Snowflake resources on behalf of a user, without exposing the user’s credentials. OAuth provides a high level of security, convenience, and flexibility, as it supports MFA, SSO, token-based authentication, and various grant types and scopes. OAuth can be implemented using either Snowflake OAuth or External OAuth, depending on the identity provider and the application12.

External browser: External browser is an authentication method that allows users to log in to Snowflake using a web browser and an external identity provider, such as Okta, Azure AD, or Ping Identity. External browser provides a high level of security and convenience, as it supports MFA, SSO, and federated authentication. External browser also provides a consistent user interface and experience across different platforms and devices34.

Okta native authentication: Okta native authentication is an authentication method that allows users to log in to Snowflake using Okta as the identity provider, without using a web browser. Okta native authentication provides a high level of security and convenience, as it supports MFA, SSO, and federated authentication. Okta native authentication also provides a native user interface and experience for Okta users, and supports various Okta features, such as password policies and user management56.

Key Pair Authentication: Key Pair Authentication is an authentication method that allows users to log in to Snowflake using a public-private key pair, without using a password. Key Pair Authentication provides a high level of security, as it relies on asymmetric encryption and digital signatures. Key Pair Authentication also provides a flexible and customizable authentication option, as it supports various key formats, algorithms, and expiration times. Key Pair Authentication is mostly used for service account users, such as applications or scripts that connect to Snowflake programmatically7 .

Password: Password is the simplest and most basic authentication method that allows users to log in to Snowflake using a username and password. Password provides a low level of security, as it relies on symmetric encryption and is vulnerable to brute force attacks or phishing. Password also provides a low level of convenience and flexibility, as it requires manual input and management, and does not support MFA or SSO. Password is the least recommended authentication method, and should be used only as a last resort or for testing purposes .

Snowflake Documentation: Snowflake OAuth

Snowflake Documentation: External OAuth

Snowflake Documentation: External Browser Authentication

Snowflake Blog: How to Use External Browser Authentication with Snowflake

Snowflake Documentation: Okta Native Authentication

Snowflake Blog: How to Use Okta Native Authentication with Snowflake

Snowflake Documentation: Key Pair Authentication

[Snowflake Blog: How to Use Key Pair Authentication with Snowflake]

[Snowflake Documentation: Password Authentication]

[Snowflake Blog: How to Use Password Authentication with Snowflake]

The minimum value supported for the buffer.flush.time property is 1 (in seconds). For higher average data flow rates, we suggest that you decrease the default value for improved latency. If cost is a greater concern than latency, you could increase the buffer flush time. Be careful to flush the Kafka memory buffer before it becomes full to avoid out of memory exceptions.https://docs.snowflake.com/en/user-guide/data-load-snowpipe-streaming-kafka

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME parameter in the COPY INTO

command is used to load semi-structured or structured data, such as CSV, into columns of the target table by matching column names in the data file with those in the table. For CSV files, this parameter requires specific conditions to be met, particularly the presence of a header row in the file, which is used to map columns to the target table.

According to the official Snowflake documentation, when the MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME parameter is used with CSV files, it is only supported in specific scenarios and requires the PARSE_HEADER file format option to be set to TRUE. This option indicates that the first row of the CSV file contains column headers, which Snowflake uses to match with the target table's column names. The matching behavior can be configured as CASE_SENSITIVE or CASE_INSENSITIVE, but the default behavior is case-sensitive unless specified otherwise.

However, there is a critical limitation when using MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME with CSV files: as of the latest Snowflake documentation, this feature is in Open Private Preview for CSV files and is not generally available for all accounts. When the MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME parameter is specified for a CSV file in an environment where this feature is not enabled, or if the PARSE_HEADER option is not set to TRUE, the COPY INTO command will return an error. This is because Snowflake cannot process the column name matching without the header parsing capability, which is not fully supported for CSV files in general availability.

The exact extract from the Snowflake documentation states:

"For loading CSV files, the MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME copy option is available in preview. It requires the use of the above-mentioned CSV file format option PARSE_HEADER = TRUE."

Additionally, the documentation clarifies:

"Boolean that specifies whether to use the first row headers in the data files to determine column names. This file format option is applied to the following actions only: Automatically detecting column definitions by using the INFER_SCHEMA function. Loading CSV data into separate columns by using the INFER_SCHEMA function and MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME copy option."

Furthermore, a known issue is noted:

"For CSV only, there is a known issue when the INCLUDE_METADATA copy option is used with MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME. Do not use this copy option when loading CSV files until the known issue is resolved."

Given that the MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME parameter is not fully supported for CSV files in general availability and requires specific preview conditions, attempting to use it without meeting those conditions, such as PARSE_HEADER = TRUE or enabling the preview feature, results in an error. Therefore, option C is correct: The command will return an error.

Option A is incorrect because, while MATCH_BY_COLUMN_NAME expects a header in the CSV file for matching when the feature is enabled, the case-sensitive matching is only true when explicitly set to CASE_SENSITIVE. Additionally, the feature's limited availability means it is not guaranteed to work without causing an error. Option B is incorrect because the parameter is not simply ignored; it triggers an error if the conditions are not met. Option D is incorrect because Snowflake does not issue a warning for unmatched columns in this context; it fails with an error when the parameter is unsupported or misconfigured.

 When a database is cloned, all of its objects, including tasks, are also cloned. However, cloned tasks are suspended by default and must be manually resumed by using the ALTER TASK command. This is to prevent the cloned tasks from running unexpectedly or interfering with the original tasks. Therefore, the reason why the tasks stop running after the cloning is because they are suspended by default (Option C). Options A, B, and D are not correct because tasks can be cloned, the objects that the tasks reference are also cloned and do not need to be fully qualified, and the Architect does not need to alter the tasks on the cloned database, only resume them. References: The answer can be verified from Snowflake’s official documentation on cloning and tasks available on their website. Here are some relevant links:

Cloning Objects | Snowflake Documentation

Tasks | Snowflake Documentation

ALTER TASK | Snowflake Documentation

The most cost-effective and administratively efficient solution is to use a combination of native and external tables. Native tables for reporting data ensure performance and governance, while external tables allow for flexibility with frequently changing experimental data. Creating roles with specific grants to datasets aligns with the principle of least privilege, centralizing access control and simplifying user management12.

References

•Snowflake Documentation on Optimizing Cost1.

•Snowflake Documentation on Controlling Cost2.