AgilePM-Foundation Exam Dumps - Agile Project Management (AgilePM v3) Foundation Exam v3 update

Adjourning: This stage occurs when a team disbands after achieving its objectives. Members reflect on their accomplishments and prepare to move on, often with a sense of closure and satisfaction.

Other Stages:

Forming: Initial stage where the team is being established.

Storming: Involves conflict as roles and expectations are clarified.

Performing: High-functioning stage focused on productivity.

Key AgilePM Concepts Referenced:

Team Development Stages: AgilePM Handbook, Chapter 5, Section 5.4.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 300 words Explanation From Exact Extract of Agile Project Management (paraphrased with Scrum alignment):

Scrum defines a small set of events within the Sprint to implement empiricism: Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective. Additionally, the Sprint itself is the overarching event—a fixed-length container that sets the cadence for inspection and adaptation, culminating in a usable Increment. By contrast, Sprint Goal is a commitment associated with the Sprint, guiding focus and coherence; Sprint Backlog is an artifact representing the plan for the Sprint; and Product Increment is an artifact representing the latest integrated outcome meeting the Definition of Done. Therefore, among the options, only Sprint is a Scrum Event.

Instrumental Success Factors (ISFs) in DSDM are crucial as they position projects for a successful outcome. ISFs are the critical elements that must be in place for a DSDM project to succeed. They provide a foundation for effective project management and delivery, ensuring that all necessary conditions are met to support the project's objectives and deliverables.

The DSDM product that describes how the benefits have actually accrued following a period in live operation is the Benefits Assessment3. This product is used to assess the actual benefits realized after the solution has been in use3.

Principle 1 – Focus on the Business Need suggests that every decision taken during a project should be viewed in light of the overriding project goal. This principle ensures that all decisions align with the main objective of delivering what the business needs, thus maintaining a clear focus on achieving the project’s goals.

In an agile context, the Scrum Master embodies servant leadership, coaching the team and the organization to apply Scrum effectively. Their accountability is to establish and uphold Scrum’s empirical approach—transparency, inspection, and adaptation—by ensuring events, artifacts, and values are understood and used as intended. They remove impediments that hinder flow, facilitate collaboration with stakeholders, and help the team focus on outcomes guided by the Sprint and Product Goals. Crucially, the Scrum Master does not manage scope, schedule, or approve the technical solution; those duties lie with product ownership and technical leadership. Nor do they “maximize value” directly—that accountability belongs to the Product Owner. Instead, the Scrum Master improves the system of work so the team can deliver value predictably and sustainably, fostering continuous improvement and adherence to agreed quality standards (e.g., Definition of Done). This aligns with option A and distinguishes it from the governance or authority-centric responsibilities implied by the other options.

This wording aligns with Scrum. Scrum explicitly defines a small set of events (Sprint, Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, Sprint Retrospective) and artifacts (Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment) that are interconnected and each serve a clear purpose. Scrum theory emphasizes empiricism supported by three pillars—transparency, inspection, and adaptation—often likened to a three-legged stool: remove a leg and the system becomes unstable. Likewise, removing or watering down any Scrum event or artifact reduces transparency and weakens inspection/adaptation, undermining outcomes. AgilePM has products/roles/phases rather than this specific “events + artifacts” construct, and “all Agile approaches” is too broad. Therefore, the missing framework is Scrum.

The phase in the DSDM process that aims to understand the scope of work and, in broad terms, how it will be carried out, by whom, when, and where is.