2V0-13.25 Exam Dumps - VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Architect

This statement expresses a financial limit — “Remaining budget” — constraining future expenditures on hardware. This is clearly a constraint, as it restricts the design options (e.g., can't procure new hardware). In the VMware Conceptual Model framework, constraints are factors that limit design choices without introducing risk or goal definitions.

According to VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 documentation, when a stretched cluster is deployed across sites with sub-5ms latency and high-speed interconnects, vSAN can be configured for zero RPO (Recovery Point Objective), ensuring 100% data consistency and availability in the event of a site failure. vSAN supports co-locating management and application workloads and provides the shared storage functionality with automatic failover capabilities.

Additionally, vSphere Virtual Volumes (vVols) provide granular control of virtual machine storage, and when backed by a storage system that supports replication and failover across sites (with support for VASA 3.0 or later), vVols can meet the same requirements for data availability and disaster recovery.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (Based on VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.3 and 9.0.1 Guides):

The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.3 Disaster Recovery Planning Guide emphasizes that testing and validation of DR plans must occur regularly and whenever infrastructure changes are made. It states:

“You can perform test runs periodically to ensure the existing disaster recovery plan works with underlying infrastructure and the configured RPO limit. VMware Live Recovery recommends users perform planned migration at regular intervals to validate the integrity of the existing DR plan.”

Additionally, the VCF 9.0.1 Design Blueprints specify that a well-defined process for reviewing and updating DR documentation between changes ensures continuity and compliance with defined Service Level Objectives (SLOs).

Thus, the correct mitigation action is to establish a structured change management process that includes DR plan updates and monthly end-to-end validation tests. Simply limiting change frequency (option C) or setting replication intervals (option D) does not ensure DR plan integrity.

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.3 Disaster Recovery Guide — “Validating and Testing DR Plans with VMware Live Recovery.”

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — “Change Management and DR Validation Requirements.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Documentation:

According to VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Design Guide (Table 59, “Certificate Management Design Recommendations”), VMware explicitly mandates that “Use a SHA-2 algorithm or higher for signed certificates. The SHA-1 algorithm is considered less secure and has been deprecated.” This recommendation (VCF-SEC-RCMD-CERT-002) is a foundational part of securing communication between management components and workload domains across the VCF environment.

The use of SHA-2 or higher ensures that all certificates used for SSL/TLS communication within the SDDC ecosystem (including vCenter, NSX Manager, and SDDC Manager) meet modern cryptographic standards to prevent vulnerabilities such as collision attacks. VMware Cloud Foundation enforces certificate management policies that require replacement of default VMCA-signed certificates with CA-signed certificates, and the SHA-2 algorithm ensures cryptographic integrity, authenticity, and resistance to tampering or impersonation.

This configuration directly satisfies the customer’s requirement for secure communication in the logical design of the workload domain. It ensures data in transit between components—such as management clusters, workload domains, and external systems—remains encrypted and trustworthy, aligning with VMware’s zero-trust and compliance-focused architectural principles.

References (VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Architecture Guide):

Table 59: Certificate Management Design Recommendations — “VCF-SEC-RCMD-CERT-002 Use a SHA-2 algorithm or higher for signed certificates.”

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 PDF, pp. 306–308, 376, and 592 (Certificate Management Design Recommendations Sections).

VMware Cloud Foundation Security Governance and Compliance Design Section (VCF-SEC-RCMD-CERT-002).

The NSX VPC Full Services Model allows tenant isolation using VRF-lite, enabling independent routing tables within the same Tier-0 gateway.

This ensures dedicated external access without requiring a separate NSX Edge cluster per tenant, thereby minimizing the number of Edge clusters.

VMware VCF 9.0 recommends VRF Lite for multi-tenant environments with centralized Edge clusters and segmented routing needs.

According to the VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide (Table 543 & vSAN Storage Cluster Separation Distributed Switch Model), when an organization enforces strict network zoning and isolation, two vSphere Distributed Switches (vDS) are used to separate management/storage traffic from workload/overlay traffic.

The vDS01 handles Management, vMotion, and Storage (vSAN/NFS) traffic within the secure zone 1, ensuring no cross-zone connectivity. The vDS02 is dedicated to workload and NSX overlay traffic (Host TEPs, Edge TEPs, and Edge uplinks) within zone 2, which aligns with NSX networking and security best practices.

This dual vDS model enforces compliance with security zone isolation policies and eliminates inter-zone traversal, as required by the design. It also aligns with VCF best practices which state:

“Provides support for traffic separation across different uplinks or vSphere Distributed Switches. Each vDS supports a distinct set of traffic types, ensuring isolation and compliance with network zoning policies.”

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — “vSAN Storage Cluster Separation Distributed Switch Model” (p.808–809)

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Networking Design — “Multiple vSphere Distributed Switches and Traffic Separation.”

These are classic Recoverability metrics. The Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) directly relate to how fast and how much data can be recovered after a failure or disaster event. The architect must ensure the VCF deployment includes recovery mechanisms, such as stretched clusters or backup/replication technology, that meet these defined RTO/RPO targets.

VMware Cloud Foundation architecture uses the RACR framework (Requirements, Assumptions, Constraints, Risks) to classify inputs:

Business requirements describe high-level outcomes the business wants to achieve, often focusing on cost, efficiency, or customer satisfaction.

Technical requirements define how infrastructure should behave to meet performance, resiliency, or security needs.

Among the given options:

A (growth by 30%) and C (no SPOF) are technical requirements.

B (security and resiliency) is also a technical requirement.

D (reduce operational costs) directly aligns with business goals, making it the correct business requirement.