2016-FRR Exam Dumps - Financial Risk and Regulation (FRR) Series

The modified duration of a bond can be estimated using the following formula:Modified Duration=Δ𝑃/𝑃Δ𝑦Modified Duration=ΔyΔP/P​whereΔ𝑃ΔPis the change in the bond's price,𝑃Pis the initial price, andΔ𝑦Δyis the change in yield.

Given:

Initial price (P) = $87,000

New price after yield change (P') = $84,500

Change in price (ΔP) = $87,000 - $84,500 = $2,500

Change in yield (Δy) = 5.7% - 4.7% = 1% = 0.01

Modified Duration =2,500/87,0000.01=0.0287350.01=2.8735≈2.880.012,500/87,000​=0.010.028735​=2.8735≈2.88

A $10,000,000 loan to IBM worth $9,800,000 would most likely not be included in the trading book. Loans held to maturity are generally part of the banking book rather than the trading book, which typically includes assets intended for trading and short-term profit.

Entering into interest rate swaps can help a risk analyst reduce the bank's exposure to rising interest rates. Interest rate swaps can be used to convert variable-rate liabilities into fixed-rate liabilities, thereby reducing the risk associated with rising interest rates.

A fully hedged portfolio is designed to minimize or eliminate the impact of market price changes on the portfolio’s value. Here are the correct and incorrect statements about hedging:

Correct Statements:

Traders can hedge their risks by taking an appropriate position in the underlying instrument.

Traders can hedge their portfolio risks by taking a position in a different instrument.

A large number of hedge positions is generally required to match the underlying transaction completely.

Incorrect Statement:

For a fully hedged portfolio, any changes in market prices will typically produce significant changes in the market value of the portfolio.

This statement is incorrect because the purpose of hedging is to protect the portfolio from market price changes, hence reducing the impact of such changes on the portfolio's value.

References

Source: How Finance Works​

The Basel II Accord addresses several aspects of legal risk including exposure to fines, private settlements, and punitive damages resulting from supervisory actions. However, it does not explicitly include negative publicity resulting from reputational damages. Legal risk under Basel II is primarily focused on tangible financial impacts rather than reputational ones.

Collecting internal operational risk event and loss information serves several purposes:

Assessing the risk of specific areas of concern (I).

Evaluating risk events and outcomes (II).

Collecting data for capital modeling (III). Getting insight into risk events in other firms in the industry (IV) typically involves external data collection rather than internal event collection.

Economic capital is a risk measure used by banks to determine the amount of capital they need to hold to remain solvent and cover potential losses:

Internal Risk Estimates: Unlike regulatory capital, which is determined by external regulatory requirements, economic capital is based on the bank's own risk assessment models and internal estimates of potential losses.

Risk Types: It considers a range of risks including credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and other financial risks that the bank might face.

Purpose: The goal is to ensure the bank has enough capital to absorb unexpected losses and to maintain confidence among depositors and investors.

Therefore, economic capital is a measure of the potential losses based on the bank's internal risk estimates.

The delta-normal method, which uses the delta to approximate the change in the price of an option, has limitations when dealing with options. This method can significantly misrepresent the risks associated with options, particularly because it only considers the linear component of the price change (delta) and ignores the convexity (gamma). Specifically, it tends to understate the risks of long positions in calls because it does not fully account for the increasing delta as the underlying asset price rises, leading to potential underestimation of the risk. Conversely, it overstates the risks of short positions in puts, as the delta of puts decreases less dramatically when the price of the underlying asset falls.