SAP-C02 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

The current architecture uses a fleet of small EC2 instances that poll SQS for URLs and write results to EFS. Because URLs arrive only occasionally and each crawl takes 10 seconds or less, EC2 instances are often idle waiting for messages. This leads to unnecessary compute and storage costs.

This workload is naturally event-driven: each URL in the SQS queue triggers a short-lived crawl operation. AWS Lambda is well suited for such event-driven, short-duration tasks. Lambda integrates natively with Amazon SQS as an event source, which allows Lambda to poll the SQS queue automatically and invoke functions when messages arrive, scaling the concurrency up and down as needed. When there are no messages, there are no Lambda invocations and no compute charges, eliminating the cost of idle EC2 instances.

For storage of crawl results, Amazon S3 is a highly durable, cost-effective object store. The current use of an EFS file system mounted on all instances is no longer necessary if each Lambda invocation can write the output directly to S3 as objects (for example, CSV files). S3 charges only for the storage used and requests, and does not require continuously running file system infrastructure.

Option B replaces the idle fleet of EC2 instances with a Lambda function that reads from SQS. This aligns compute usage with actual work and takes advantage of serverless scaling and pricing.

Option E modifies the web-crawling process to store results in Amazon S3 instead of EFS, removing the need to maintain an EFS file system and its associated costs.

Option A increases instance size to m5.8xlarge, which greatly increases capacity and cost. Reducing the number of instances by 50% does not offset the large increase in instance size; it does not address idle capacity and likely increases overall cost.

Option C uses Amazon Neptune, which is a managed graph database service. It is not needed for storing simple CSV output; it is more complex and more expensive than S3 for this use case.

Option D uses Aurora Serverless MySQL. While Aurora Serverless can automatically scale, using a relational database to store simple crawl outputs adds unnecessary cost and operational complexity compared to S3 objects.

Therefore, moving the crawling logic to Lambda triggered by SQS (option B) and writing results directly to Amazon S3 (option E) meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way.

The correct answer is D. Deploy the application on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) with AWS Fargate and enable auto scaling behind an Application Load Balancer. Create additional read replicas for the DB instance. Create an Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka cluster and configure the application services to use the cluster. Store static content in Amazon S3 behind an Amazon CloudFront distribution.

Option D meets the requirements of the scenario because it allows you to reduce operational overhead and support the product release by using the following AWS services and features:

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a fully managed service that allows you to run Kubernetes applications on AWS without needing to install, operate, or maintain your own Kubernetes control plane. You can use Amazon EKS to deploy your containerized application services on a Kubernetes cluster that is compatible with your existing tools and processes.

AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine that eliminates the need to provision and manage servers for your containers. You can use AWS Fargate as the launch type for your Amazon EKS pods, which are the smallest deployable units of computing in Kubernetes. You can also enable auto scaling for your pods, which allows you to automatically adjust the number of pods based on the demand or custom metrics.

An Application Load Balancer (ALB) is a load balancer that distributes traffic across multiple targets in multiple Availability Zones using HTTP or HTTPS protocols. You can use an ALB to balance the load across your Amazon EKS pods and provide high availability and fault tolerance for your application.

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL is a fully managed relational database service that supports the PostgreSQL open source database engine. You can create additional read replicas for your DB instance, which are copies of your primary DB instance that can handle read-only queries and improve performance. You can also useread replicas to scale out beyond the capacity of a single DB instance for read-heavy workloads.

Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Kafka (Amazon MSK) is a fully managed service that makes it easy to build and run applications that use Apache Kafka to process streaming data. Apache Kafka is an open source platform for building real-time data pipelines and streaming applications. You can use Amazon MSK to create and manage a Kafka cluster that is highly available, secure, and compatible with your existing Kafka applications. You can also configure your application services to use the Amazon MSK cluster as a source or destination of streaming data.

Amazon S3 is an object storage service that offers high durability, availability, and scalability. You can store static content such as images, videos, or documents in Amazon S3 buckets, which are containers for objects. You can also serve static content directly from Amazon S3 using public URLs or presigned URLs.

Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency and high transfer speeds. You can use Amazon CloudFront to create a distribution that caches static content from your Amazon S3 bucket at edge locations closer to your users. This can improve the performance and user experience of your application.

Option A is incorrect because creating an EC2 Auto Scaling group behind an ALB would not reduce operational overhead as much as using AWS Fargate with Amazon EKS, as you would still need to manage EC2 instances for your containers. Creating additional read replicas for the DB instance would not provide high availability or fault tolerance in case of a failure of the primary DB instance, unlike deploying the DB instance in Multi-AZ mode. Creating Amazon Kinesis data streams would not be compatible with your existing Apache Kafka applications, unlike using Amazon MSK.

Option B is incorrect because creating an EC2 Auto Scaling group behind an ALB would not reduce operational overhead as much as using AWS Fargate with Amazon EKS, as you would still need to manage EC2 instances for your containers. Creating Amazon Kinesis data streams would not be compatible with your existing Apache Kafka applications, unlike using Amazon MSK. Storing and serving static content directly from Amazon S3 would not provide optimal performance and user experience, unlike using Amazon CloudFront.

Option C is incorrect because deploying the application on a Kubernetes cluster created on the EC2 instances behind an ALB would not reduce operational overhead as much as using AWS Fargate with Amazon EKS, as you would still need to manage EC2 instances and Kubernetes control plane for your containers. Using Amazon API Gateway to interact with the application would add an unnecessary layer of complexity and cost to your architecture, as you would need to create and maintain an API gateway that proxies requests to your ALB.

The Auto Scaling group can automatically launch and terminate EC2 instances based on the demand and health of the web application. The launch template can specify the configuration of the EC2 instances, such as the AMI, instance type, security group, and user data. The existing ALB can distribute the traffic to the EC2 instances in the Auto Scaling group. The existing EC2 instances can be attached to the Auto Scaling group without deleting them or the ALB. This option minimizes downtime and preserves the current setup of the web application. References: [What is Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling?] , [Launch templates], [Attach a load balancer to your Auto Scaling group] , [Attach EC2 instances to your Auto Scaling group]

A DAX cluster can be deployed with one or two nodes for development or test workloads. One- and two-node clusters are not fault-tolerant, and we don ' t recommend using fewer than three nodes for production use. If a one- or two-node cluster encounters software or hardware errors, the cluster can become unavailable or lose cached data.A DAX cluster can be deployed with one or two nodes for development or test workloads. One- and two-node clusters are not fault-tolerant, and we don ' t recommend using fewer than three nodes for production use. If a one- or two-node cluster encounters software or hardware errors, the cluster can become unavailable or lose cached data.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/DAX.concepts.cluster.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/awsaccountbilling/latest/aboutv2/manage-cost-categories.html

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/cost-explorer-analyze-spending-and-usage/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/awsaccountbilling/latest/aboutv2/manage-cost-categories.htmlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/cost-management/latest/userguide/ce-enable.html

The best combination of actions to meet the company’s requirements is Options A, C, and F.

Option A involves activating the user-defined cost allocation tags that represent the application and the team. This will allow the company to assign costs to different applications or teams, and will allow them to be tracked in the monthly AWS bill.

Option C involves creating a cost category for each application in Billing and Cost Management. This will allow the company to easily identify and compare costs across different applications and teams.

Option F involves enabling Cost Explorer. This will allow the company to view the costs of their AWS resources over the last 12 months and to create forecasts for the next 12 months.

These recommendations are in line with the official Amazon Textbook and Resources for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional certification. In particular, the book states that “You can use cost allocation tags to group your costs by application, team, or other categories” (Source:https://d1.awsstatic.com/training-and-certification/docs-sa-pro/AWS_Certified_Solutions_Architect_Professional_Exam_Guide_EN_v1.5.pdf).Additionally, the book states that “Cost Explorer enables you to view the costs of your AWS resources over the last 12 months and to create forecasts for the next 12 months” (Source:https://d1.awsstatic.com/training-and-certification/docs-sa-pro/AWS_Certified_Solutions_Architect_Professional_Exam_Guide_EN_v1.5.pdf).

Dis the right choice:EFS with Max I/O modeis designed formassively parallel workloadslike big data. It supports high throughput and concurrent access from many EC2 nodes across AZs.

A(Storage Gateway) is not optimized for high-performance, low-latency compute clusters.

Bis limited in performance (latency optimized for single-threaded workloads).

C(EBS) cannot be shared across AZs and is not POSIX-compatible for concurrent multi-node access.

Option B is correct because creating an IAM role in the application account that has permissions to access the secrets and creating an IAM role in the DBA account that has permissions to assume the role in the application account eliminates the need to manually share the secrets. This approach uses cross-account IAM roles to grant access to the secrets in the application account. The database administrators canassume the role in the application account from their EC2 instance in the DBA account and retrieve the secrets without having to store them locally or share them manually2

In this scenario, the Amazon EC2 instances are in an Auto Scaling group already which means that the database read operations is the possible bottleneck especially during the month-end wherein the reports are generated. This can be solved by creating RDS read replicas.