SAA-C03 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate (SAA-C03)

This option is the mostefficient because it uses data filters, which are specifications that restrict access to certain data in query results and engines integrated with Lake Formation1. Data filters can be used to implement row-level security and cell-level security, which are techniques to prevent access to portions of the data that contain sensitiveinformation2. Data filters can be applied when granting Lake Formation permissions on a Data Catalog table, and can use PartiQL expressions to filter data based on conditions3. This solution meets the requirement of providing a secure solution to prevent access to portions of the data that contain sensitive information. Option A is less efficient because it uses an IAM role that includes permissions to access Lake Formation tables, which is a way to grant access to data in Lake Formation using IAM policies4. However, this does not provide a way to prevent access to portions of the data that contain sensitive information. Option C is less efficient because it uses an AWS Lambda function that removes sensitive information before Lake Formation ingests the data, which is a way to perform data cleansing or transformation using serverless functions. However, this could involve significant changes to the application code and logic, and could also result in data loss or inconsistency. Option D is less efficient because it uses an AWS Lambda function that periodically queries and removes sensitive information from Lake Formation tables, which is a way to perform data cleansing or transformation using serverless functions. However, this could involve significant changes to the application code and logic, and could also result in data loss or inconsistency.

This answer is correct because it provides a resilient and durable replacement for the on-premises file share that is compatible with Windows IIS web servers. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a fully managed service that provides shared file storage built on Windows Server. It supports the SMB protocol and integrates with Microsoft Active Directory, which enables seamless access and authentication for Windows-based applications. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server also offers the following benefits:

Resilience: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server can be deployed in multiple Availability Zones, which provides high availability and failover protection. It also supports automatic backups and restores, as well as self-healing features that detect and correct issues.

Durability: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server replicates data within and across Availability Zones, and stores data on highly durable storage devices. It also supports encryption at rest and in transit, as well as file access auditing and data deduplication.

Performance: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server delivers consistent sub-millisecond latencies and high throughput for file operations. It also supports SSD storage, native Windows features such as Distributed File System (DFS) Namespaces and Replication, and user-driven performance scaling.

Amazon S3 is a highly scalable, durable, and cost-effective object storage service that can store millions of images1. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database that can handle high throughput and low latency for key-value and document data2. By using S3 to store the images and DynamoDB to store the geographic codes and image S3 URLs, the solution can achieve high availability and scalability during natural disasters. It can alsoleverage DynamoDB’s features such as caching, auto-scaling, and global tables to improve performance and reduce costs2.

A. Store the images and geographic codes in a database table Use Oracle running on an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ DB instance. This solution willnot meet the requirement of scalability and cost-effectiveness, as Oracle is a relational database that may not handle large volumes of unstructured data such as images efficiently3. It also involves higher licensing and operational costs than S3 and DynamoDB12.

C. Store the images and geographic codes in an Amazon DynamoDB table Configure DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) during times of high load. This solution willnot meet therequirement of cost-effectiveness, as storing images in DynamoDB will consume more storage space and incur higher charges than storing them in S312. It will also require additional configuration and management of DAX clusters to handle high load.

D. Store the images in Amazon S3 buckets Store geographic codes and image S3 URLs in a database table Use Oracle running on an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ DB instance. This solution will not meet the requirement of scalability and cost-effectiveness, asOracle is a relational database that may not handle high throughput and low latency for key-value data such as geographic codes efficiently3. It also involves higher licensing and operational costs than DynamoDB2.

Reference URL: https://dynobase.dev/dynamodb-vs-s3/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/header-caching.html Configuring caching based on the language of the viewer: If you want CloudFront to cache different versions of your objects based on the language specified in the request, configure CloudFront to forward the Accept-Language header to your origin.

• Launching instances within a single AZ and using a cluster placement group provides the lowest network latency and highest bandwidth between instances. This maximizes performance for an in-memory database and high-throughput application.

• Communications between instances in the same AZ and placement group are free, minimizing data transfer charges. Inter-AZ and public IP traffic can incur charges.

• A cluster placement group enables the instances to be placed close together within the AZ, allowing the high network throughput required. Partition groups span AZs, reducing bandwidth.

• Auto Scaling across zones could launch instances in AZs that increase data transfer charges. It may reduce network throughput, impacting performance.