PRINCE2-7-Practitioner Exam Dumps - PRINCE2 Project Management Practitioner (Version 7)

The correct answer is B . PRINCE2 product-based planning determines the logical sequence of work by examining the products to be created and the dependencies between those products . Once those relationships are understood, activities or work packages that do not depend on one another can legitimately be scheduled in parallel.

In this scenario, the project manager and BuildyBrick’s planning specialist use the product flow together with historical information from previous projects. This is appropriate because the product flow provides the dependency logic, while previous project data can improve the realism of estimates and planning decisions. If the utilities and systems products are independent, separate work packages can therefore proceed concurrently.

Option A is incorrect because historical information should inform planning but cannot replace dependency analysis. A schedule should be derived from the logical relationships between products rather than copied mechanically from previous projects. Option C introduces a restriction that PRINCE2 does not impose: products delivered by the same supplier do not automatically need to be produced sequentially. Option D confuses tolerances , which establish delegated performance limits, with dependencies, which determine the logical production sequence.

The scenario is therefore a valid example of using product-based planning to identify opportunities for parallel delivery without compromising dependency logic.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Plans practice; product-based planning; product flow; dependencies; scheduling; work packages; lessons from previous projects.

===============

The correct answer is B . During evaluate a work package , the team manager periodically assesses actual and forecast performance against the authorized work package and, where applicable, the team plan. This requires consideration of relevant product, quality, risk, issue, lesson, and progress information so that the current status and forecast completion can be determined accurately.

Here, the missing electrical cabling has caused the security-system installation to be forecast one week late and beyond the delegated work-package time tolerance. Because management by exception operates through delegated tolerances, the team manager cannot simply absorb a forecast breach that lies outside the authority provided by the project manager. The project manager must therefore be informed.

The checkpoint report is the normal mechanism by which the team manager reports work-package progress to the project manager. However, a forecast tolerance breach should also be brought promptly to the project manager’s attention rather than waiting passively for routine reporting.

Option A identifies only one aspect of evaluation and fails to address the forecast tolerance breach. Option C incorrectly removes evaluation responsibility from the team manager. Option D bypasses the management hierarchy: a team manager escalates work-package exceptions to the project manager , not directly to the project board.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Managing product delivery; evaluate a work package; checkpoint reports; work-package tolerances; management by exception; escalation.

===============

The correct answer is B . PRINCE2 distinguishes the business layer from the project management layer. The business layer commissions projects, establishes the broader organizational context, and appoints an appropriate project executive who will represent the business interest and become ultimately accountable for the project’s success within the project board.

The scenario explicitly states that the LOB Portfolio Director is acting at the business layer . Consequently, selecting and appointing an appropriate project executive is consistent with the responsibilities associated with that level of governance.

Option A is too broad. The appointment is not appropriate merely because the Mayor can delegate the activity to any senior stakeholder. The suitability arises because the Portfolio Director is acting as the relevant business-layer representative. Option C incorrectly assumes that the Mayor must personally make the appointment because of the project’s civic significance; PRINCE2 does not impose such a requirement. Option D similarly assigns the responsibility automatically to the Head of Portfolio Office, even though the scenario explicitly identifies the Portfolio Director as the relevant business-layer representative.

The key distinction is therefore between business-layer governance and project-level management. The project executive is appointed from the business layer and subsequently leads the project board.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Organization practice; business layer; project executive; commissioning a project; project board structure and accountability.

===============

The correct answer is D . Under the manage by stages principle, a PRINCE2 project is divided into management stages that create defined governance and decision points. The project manager manages the current authorized stage, while the project board retains control over whether the project should proceed into the next management stage.

At a stage boundary, the project manager normally provides the information required for the project board to assess performance, review the updated business case and project plan, consider risks and issues, and evaluate the next stage plan. The board can then decide whether continued investment remains justified and whether the next stage should be authorized. PeopleCert guidance describes management stages as controlled segments with review points at which continuation can be approved or stopped.

Releasing funding for stages 2 and 3 does not remove the governance requirement to reassess the project before stage 3 starts. Option A confuses the project manager’s delegated day-to-day authority within an authorized stage with authority to proceed automatically across stage boundaries. Option B concerns reporting customization rather than stage authorization. Option C incorrectly focuses on which corporate entity provides funding rather than the PRINCE2 control mechanism being tested.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Manage by stages; Managing a stage boundary; Directing a project; continued business justification; authorization of a stage.

===============

The correct answer is B — Prepare the next stage plan . The managing a stage boundary process ensures that the project board receives sufficient information to review the current stage and make an informed decision about authorizing the next one. Preparing the next stage plan includes determining how the forthcoming stage will be organized, resourced, managed, and controlled.

The replacement subcontractor will perform important utilities and systems work during stage 3. Consequently, the project manager must consider whether the existing project management team remains appropriate for the forthcoming stage. Recommending the subcontractor’s account manager as the new senior supplier is directly connected with establishing appropriate supplier representation and governance for the work that will be undertaken in that next stage.

Option A concerns revising the higher-level project plan using current information and forecasts; it does not primarily establish stage-specific project management team arrangements. Option C concerns assessing how the current stage performed, including achievements and lessons. Option D occurs after the necessary stage-boundary information has been prepared and is used to request authorization from the project board.

The recommendation should therefore be developed while preparing the next stage plan , so that the required organization and supplier representation are clear before authorization of stage 3 is requested.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Managing a stage boundary; prepare the next stage plan; organization; senior supplier; supplier representation; project management team.

===============