PC-BA-FBA-20 Exam Dumps - BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis V4.0

Gap analysis is a technique for comparing the current state of the business ('As Is') with the desired future state ('To Be') to identify what is missing and what needs to change. The logical first step is to establish the current starting point. Therefore, the process begins by:

Assemble representations of existing situation (The 'As Is' model). This involves investigating and documenting the current processes, organisation, people, information, and technology (POPIT).

Assemble representations of target or desired situation (The 'To Be' model).

Identify gaps to be addressed (The difference between As Is and To Be).

Consider possible actions to address the gaps (Developing the recommendations).

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Gap Analysis)

===========

Design thinking is a human-centered, iterative approach used to uncover innovative solutions by focusing on user needs and exploring multiple possibilities. It emphasizes creativity, collaboration, and experimentation.

Key Characteristics of Techniques:

Design Thinking: Uses an iterative process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test) to generate innovative options.

Fishbone Diagram: A root cause analysis tool, not focused on innovation.

Rich Pictures: A visual representation of a situation, useful for understanding context but not for generating innovative options.

Mind Maps: A brainstorming tool that organizes ideas hierarchically, but it does not inherently follow an iterative approach.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Design thinking:Design thinking explicitly uses an iterative approach to uncover innovative options.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. Fishbone diagram:Fishbone diagrams focus on identifying root causes, not innovation.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Rich pictures:Rich pictures visualize complex situations but do not inherently foster innovation.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Mind maps:Mind maps organize ideas but do not follow an iterative, innovative process like design thinking.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The technique that uses an iterative approach to uncover innovative options is:

A. Design thinking.

The investigation technique best suited to achieve these outcomes is the Interview. A one-on-one interview provides a private and focused setting, which is essential for discussing confidential or politically sensitive issues that a stakeholder would not be comfortable raising in a group or on a written questionnaire. The personal interaction during an interview is the most effective way to build rapport with the stakeholder, leading to more open and honest communication. This deeper level of trust and detailed conversation is what allows the analyst to gain a richer appreciation of the political and cultural landscape of the business. Special purpose records, document analysis, and questionnaires are more impersonal and cannot provide the same level of qualitative insight or trust.

(Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Investigative Techniques, Interviews)

Scenario analysis is an investigation technique used to explore and evaluate potential future scenarios or situations. It helps stakeholders understand how different factors might impact a business area or process.

Key Characteristics of Scenario Analysis:

Broad View: Scenario analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the business area by considering multiple possible outcomes.

Prototyping Basis: The insights gained from scenario analysis can inform the development of prototypes.

Tacit Knowledge Identification: By exploring real-world scenarios, it helps uncover implicit knowledge embedded in business practices.

Testing Scripts: Scenario analysis is not directly involved in preparing test scripts, which are typically created during the testing phase.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Provides a broad view of the business area under investigation:Scenario analysis evaluates multiple possibilities, offering a broad perspective.Conclusion: This is true .

B. Provides a basis for developing subsequent prototypes:Insights from scenario analysis can guide prototype development.Conclusion: This is true .

C. Helps identify tacit knowledge used in business practice:Exploring scenarios uncovers hidden knowledge and practices.Conclusion: This is true .

D. Helps prepare the scripts that will be used to test the delivered solution:Preparing test scripts is part of testing activities, not scenario analysis.Conclusion: This is false .

A use case diagram is a visual representation of how users (or systems) interact with a system to achieve specific goals. Actors represent the entities (e.g., users or external systems) that expect to receive services from the system.

Key Elements of a Use Case Diagram:

Actors: Represent individuals or systems that interact with the system to achieve a goal.

System Boundaries: Define the scope of the system being modeled.

Users: While "users" may seem similar to actors, the term "actors" is the correct technical term in use case diagrams.

Entities: Entities typically refer to data objects or components, not those receiving services.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Actors:Actors are the correct element used to indicate those who expect to receive a service from the system.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. System boundaries:System boundaries define the scope of the system but do not represent those receiving services.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Users:While users may interact with the system, the correct term in use case diagrams is "actors."Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Entities:Entities represent data objects or components, not those receiving services.Conclusion: This is not correct .