OGBA-101 Exam Dumps - TOGAF Business Architecture Foundation Exam (English)

The diagram of an architecture development cycle shows three phases of the TOGAF ADM. The correct phase names corresponding to the labels 1, 2 and 3 are Requirements Management, Implementation Governance, and Preliminary respectively3. These phases are described as follows:

• Requirements Management (label 1): This phase provides a process for managing architecture requirements throughout the ADM cycle3. It ensures that requirements are captured, stored, prioritized, and addressed by relevant ADM phases3. It also ensures that requirements are validated and updated as necessary3.
• Implementation Governance (label 2): This phase provides a process for ensuring that the implementation projects conform to the defined architecture3. It involves establishing an implementation governance model, defining architecture contracts and compliance reviews, and monitoring and supporting the implementation projects3.
• Preliminary (label 3): This phase provides a process for preparing and planning the architecture project3. It involves defining the scope and vision of the project, customizing the ADM process and content framework, defining principles and governance structures, and evaluating the enterprise architecture maturity and readiness3.

In the provided diagram, item A refers to the Architecture Repository, which is a part of the TOGAF framework where all the architecture assets are stored. This includes the architectural models, patterns, architecture descriptions, and other artifacts relevant to the architecture. Item B is labeled as the Governing Board, which is likely referring to the Architecture Board or a similar governance structure responsible for oversight and decision-making regarding the enterprise architecture. Item C refers to Enterprise Capability, which encompasses the processes, tools, skills, and other capabilities that enable the architecture function within the enterprise.

In the context of the TOGAF Architecture Repository, the Solutions Continuum represents an architectural representation of Solution Building Blocks (SBBs) supporting the Architecture Landscape. It provides a view of the available and implemented solutions that can be used or adapted for new initiatives.

The development of Business Architecture Descriptions is always iterative because it involves constant refinement and validation of the architecture models and views based on stakeholder feedback and changing requirements. Therefore, any Architecture Description that was created in Phase A may need to be updated in Phase B as new information or insights emerge. Phase B does not require that all Architecture Descriptions be updated, only those that are relevant and necessary for the Business Architecture. Phase B is an ADM Architecture Development phase, but that does not explain why Architecture Descriptions need to be updated. A new value stream may or may not require updating existing Architecture Descriptions depending on its scope and impact.

In TOGAF's ADM, the development of architecture is an iterative process. During Phase A, initial business capability maps and value streams are created to establish the Architecture Vision. However, as stakeholders provide more detailed inputs and requirements are refined, it is necessary to update the Architecture Descriptions. This is an iterative process that continues into Phase B, Business Architecture, where these descriptions are further developed and refined.

A value stream is an approach to modeling business value that focuses on the end-to-end sequence of activities that an organization performs to deliver a product or service to the customer. This perspective is designed to help organizations understand the full lifecycle of value creation, from the initial customer demand to the final delivery of value. It provides a holistic view of the flow of value through the organization and is instrumental in identifying areas of waste and opportunities for improvement to enhance the overall customer experience. Value streams help in visualizing and optimizing the steps necessary to effect change in the business processes and systems that create value for the customers.

The graphic illustrates a method for developing alternative target architectures in Phase E of the TOGAF ADM1. The method involves identifying and evaluating candidate architectures based on criteria such as business value, cost, risk, and feasibility1. The method helps to identify the most suitable architecture solution for the enterprise.

The graphic illustrates a method that supports the TOGAF ADM by identifying and evaluating alternative target architectures. The process begins with a vision, influenced by principles and requirements, leading to the consideration of alternatives. Each alternative is assessed based on different criteria, leading to the selection of the most suitable target architecture. This isconsistent with the TOGAF approach of developing a set of potential architectures and then selecting the one that best meets the enterprise's needs.

A business model is a description of the rationale for how an organization creates, delivers, and captures value4. Value is defined as the worth or importance of something to someone6. A business model explains what value proposition the organization offers to its customers, what revenue streams it generates from delivering the value proposition, what cost structure it incurs to create and deliver the value proposition, what key resources and activities are needed to create and deliver the value proposition, and what key partnerships are leveraged to support the value creation and delivery process4.

According to the TOGAF Series Guide to Value Streams (Version 1), a value stream stage is defined as “a distinct part of a value stream that represents a group of activities contributing to an overall result” 5. A value stream stage can be expressed as a noun phrase that indicates what outcome or state is achieved by completing the stage5. For example, some possible value stream stages are “Product Ordered”, “Payment Processed”, or “Customer Satisfied”. The example value stream shows how an online retailer creates and delivers value for its customers by performing five value stream stages: “Acquire Retail Product”, “Advertise Channels”, “Display Products”, “Enable Selection”, “Process Payment”, and “Deliver Product(s)” 5. Therefore, the value stream is decomposed into five value stream stages.

The technique shown in the example is called heat mapping. It is a technique that can be used to show a range of different perspectives on a business capability map, such as maturity, effectiveness, performance, and value or cost contribution of each capability to the business2. Different attributes determine the colors of each capability on the business capability map. Heat mapping can help to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the business architecture.

Value networks are an approach to model, measure, and analyze business value that is primarily concerned with identifying the participants involved in creating and delivering value3. Value networks focus on the relationships and interactions among the participants, such as customers, suppliers, partners, employees, and other stakeholders3. Value networks can help to understand how value flows through the network and how it can be improved or optimized.

The chart depicted is a Gantt chart, which typically represents the schedule for project activities. In the context of TOGAF's ADM, it is used to illustrate the sequence and interdependencies of tasks across different phases of architecture development. The ADM is an iterative cycle that includes various phases, from the preliminary phase, through architecture vision, business, information systems, and technology architectures, to opportunities and solutions, migration planning, implementation governance, and architecture change management. Each phase must be conducted in a sequence to ensure that the outputs of one phase feed into the next, thereby producing a coherent and structured architecture.

The table describes the steps involved in Phase B (Business Architecture), Phase C (Information Systems Architectures), and Phase D (Technology Architecture) of the TOGAF ADM5. These phases are responsible for developing the target architectures for each domain and identifying the gaps between the baseline and target architectures. The table shows the outputs and outcomes of each phase, as well as the essential knowledge required for each phase.

A TOGAF business scenario is a technique that can be used to fully understand the requirements of information technology and align it with business needs1. It is not a business case, which is a document that provides justification for a proposed project or initiative6. It is not a method to develop a business model, which is a description of how an organization creates, delivers, and captures value for its stakeholders7. It is not a use-case, which is a description of how a system interacts with external actors to achieve a specific goal.

A TOGAF business scenario is a technique that helps to derive architecture requirements by describing a business process, application, or set of activities. It includes detailing the actors, roles, goals, business policies, business processes, and the environment in which the scenario takes place. Business scenarios are used within TOGAF to ensure that the architecture has a clear link to the business requirements.

Risk Management is the discipline that addresses the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks followed by coordinated application of resources to minimize, control, and monitor the impact of unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of opportunities. It is about striking a balance between the positive outcomes of opportunities and the negative outcomes of risks, ensuring that the enterprise can achieve its objectives while keeping potential threats under control.

According to the TOGAF Series Guide: Business Capabilities, after documenting all of the business capabilities, the next step is to organize them in a logical manner1. This can be done by using techniques such as layering, sorting, mapping, and leveling1. These techniques can help to classify, group, and align capabilities into categories for a deeper understanding of how they support the business goals and objectives1. Organizing the business capabilities can also help to identify dependencies, gaps, overlaps, or redundancies among them1.