ESRS-Professional Exam Dumps - ESRS Professional Certification Exam

Under ESRS, organizations are required to disclose material impacts, risks, and opportunities (IRO) in accordance withdouble materiality principles. The ESRS framework emphasizes transparency and structured reporting of sustainability matters that arematerial from both impact and financial perspectives.

Key Disclosure Requirements for Material IROsAccording to ESRS 2, organizations must disclose:

(A) The outcomes of their double materiality assessment: Organizations need to explain how they determined material sustainability matters, covering both impact and financial materiality​.

(B) Information outlined in the topical ESRS and sector-specific standards: The disclosure of IROs must align withspecific ESRS topical standards(e.g., ESRS E1 for climate change, ESRS S1 for own workforce) andsector-specific standards, ensuring comprehensive reporting​.

(C) Minimum Disclosure Requirements on policies, actions, and targets: Organizations must disclosepolicies, strategies, action plans, and progress tracking mechanismsrelated to managing material sustainability risks and opportunities. ESRS mandates these disclosures to provide transparency on an entity’s approach torisk mitigation and opportunity realization​.

(D) A general overview of their sustainability policies, even if unrelated to specific material matters:

ESRS doesnotrequire companies to provide general sustainability policy overviewsunlessthey relate to material sustainability matters. The focus is on material disclosures that affect business operations or external stakeholders​.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, ESRS 2, Section 4.1 & IRO-1– Covers disclosure requirements for identifying and assessing material impacts, risks, and opportunities​.

EFRAG Compilation Explanations (January – November 2024)– Details about ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 disclosure requirements on materiality​.

Incorrect OptionOfficial References:

Thedouble materiality assessmentinvolves identifying sustainability matters that are material either from:

An impact perspective(the organization's effects on people and the environment).

A financial perspective(how sustainability matters affect the organization financially).

Thecorrect stepsin conducting this assessment include:

(A) Comparing identified material topics with ESRS 1 AR 16– This ensures alignment withpredefined sustainability mattersin ESRS​.

(C) Using ESRS 2 IRO-1– This disclosure requirement mandates companies toreport on their methodology for identifying impacts, risks, and opportunities​.

(D) Following SBM-3 of ESRS 2– This section provides requirements fordisclosing the material impacts, risks, and opportunities identified through the materiality assessment​.

(B) False:Entity-specific disclosures must coverall material sustainability topics, even those not explicitly covered in ESRS​.

(E) False:Both financial and impact materiality must be considered(double materiality), not just financial materiality​.

(F) False:Double materiality assessments are mandatoryfor all organizations reporting under ESRS​.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, Section 3.3 on Double Materiality​

EFRAG Compilation on Double Materiality Assessments, providing step-by-step guidance on ESRS compliance​

Why the other options are incorrect:References:==============

The statement that "Policymakers and regulators worldwide are increasingly mandating limited assurance for sustainability reporting in Europe and mandatory assurance in all Asian and African countries" isfalsefor the following reasons:

Limited Assurance in Europe

Under theCorporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), theEuropean Union (EU) is progressively implementing mandatory assurance for sustainability reporting, but it isstarting with limited assurancebefore transitioning toreasonable assuranceby 2028​.

TheCommittee of European Auditing Oversight Bodies (CEAOB)has issuednon-binding guidelines on limited assuranceto harmonize the approach across EU member states​.

No Universal Mandatory Assurance in Asia and Africa

Sustainability assurancevaries by countryinAsia and Africa, with some jurisdictions adoptingvoluntaryorlimitedrequirements rather thanmandatory assurance.

TheEU approachis influencing global discussions, butthere is no blanket requirementfor full mandatory assurance acrossallAsian and African countries​.

While certainAsian countries (e.g., Japan, Singapore, China, and India)are enhancing their sustainability reporting frameworks, assurance requirements remaindiverse and sector-dependent.

InAfrica, sustainability reporting is growing, especially in South Africa underKing IV principles, but assurance isnot uniformly mandatoryacross the continent​.

Limited assurance is currently being phased in across the EU, but not yet fully mandated at the reasonable assurance level.

There is no global requirement for mandatory assurance across all Asian and African countries.

Therefore, the statement isfalse.

Conclusion:Official Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772, various EFRAG guidance documents, and CSRD-related references:

EU CSRD Recital 60: Roadmap for assurance from limited to reasonable​.

CEAOB Limited Assurance Guidelines (September 2024)​.

TheCorporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)replaced theNon-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD)to address itslimitationsin scope and reporting requirements. Below are the explanations for each option:

A. False– The NFRDdid notrequire all companies in the EU to include a non-financial statement. Instead, itapplied only to large public-interest entitieswith 500 or more employees.

B. True– The NFRD applied tolarge public-interest entities, includinglisted companies, banks, and insurance firms with more than 500 employees​.

C. False– The NFRDdid not mandate external assurancefor sustainability information. TheCSRD introduced mandatory assuranceat the EU level​.

D. False– The CSRDdid not replace the NFRD; rather, itexpanded and strengthened reporting requirements. TheNFRD was replaced by the CSRD, but not the other way around​.

E. True– TheCSRD was introduced to improve the scope and depth of sustainability reportingcompared to the NFRD. Itexpanded the number of entities required to report, standardized disclosures via ESRS, and introduced third-party assurance requirements​.

Key Differences Between CSRD and NFRDFeature

NFRD (Old Directive)

CSRD (New Directive)

Scope

Large public-interest entities (500+ employees)

All large companies + listed SMEs

Assurance

Not required

Mandatory external assurance

Disclosure Requirements

Limited sustainability disclosures

Comprehensive ESRS-based reporting

Reporting Standards

No standardized framework

ESRS-based mandatory framework

Application Date

In force since 2018

Applies from 2024 onwards

CSRD Directive (EU) 2022/2464– Assurance & Reporting Provisions​.

ESRS Compilation Explanations January - November 2024​.

Official References: