DOP-C02 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional

Searching for workable clues to ace the Amazon Web Services DOP-C02 Exam? You’re on the right place! ExamCert has realistic, trusted and authentic exam prep tools to help you achieve your desired credential. ExamCert’s DOP-C02 PDF Study Guide, Testing Engine and Exam Dumps follow a reliable exam preparation strategy, providing you the most relevant and updated study material that is crafted in an easy to learn format of questions and answers. ExamCert’s study tools aim at simplifying all complex and confusing concepts of the exam and introduce you to the real exam scenario and practice it with the help of its testing engine and real exam dumps

Go to page:

<< First
Prev
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Next
Last >>

Question # 57

A development team uses AWS CodeCommit for version control for applications. The development team uses AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeBuild. and AWS CodeDeploy for CI/CD infrastructure. In CodeCommit, the development team recently merged pull requests that did not pass long-running tests in the code base. The development team needed to perform rollbacks to branches in the codebase, resulting in lost time and wasted effort.

A DevOps engineer must automate testing of pull requests in CodeCommit to ensure that reviewers more easily see the results of automated tests as part of the pull request review.

What should the DevOps engineer do to meet this requirement?

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that reacts to the pullRequestStatusChanged event. Create an AWS Lambda function that invokes a CodePipeline pipeline with a CodeBuild action that runs the tests for the application. Program the Lambda function to post the CodeBuild badge as a comment on the pull request so that developers will see the badge in their code review.

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that reacts to the pullRequestCreated event. Create an AWS Lambda function that invokes a CodePipeline pipeline with a CodeBuild action that runs the tests for the application. Program the Lambda function to post the CodeBuild test results as a comment on the pull request when the test results are complete.

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that reacts to pullRequestCreated and pullRequestSourceBranchUpdated events. Create an AWS Lambda function that invokes a CodePipeline pipeline with a CodeBuild action that runs the tests for the application. Program the Lambda function to post the CodeBuild badge as a comment on the pull request so that developers will see the badge in their code review.

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that reacts to the pullRequestStatusChanged event. Create an AWS Lambda function that invokes a CodePipeline pipeline with a CodeBuild action that runs the tests for the application. Program the Lambda function to post the CodeBuild test results as a comment on the pull request when the test results are complete.

Full Access

Question # 58

A DevOps engineer is researching the least expensive way to implement an image batch processing cluster on AWS. The application cannot run in Docker containers and must run on Amazon EC2. The batch job stores checkpoint data on an NFS volume and can tolerate interruptions. Configuring the cluster software from a generic EC2 Linux image takes 30 minutes.

What is the MOST cost-effective solution?

Use Amazon EFS (or checkpoint data. To complete the job, use an EC2 Auto Scaling group and an On-Demand pricing model to provision EC2 instances temporally.

Use GlusterFS on EC2 instances for checkpoint data. To run the batch job configure EC2 instances manually When the job completes shut down the instances manually.

Use Amazon EFS for checkpoint data Use EC2 Fleet to launch EC2 Spot Instances and utilize user data to configure the EC2 Linux instance on startup.

Use Amazon EFS for checkpoint data Use EC2 Fleet to launch EC2 Spot Instances Create a custom AMI for the cluster and use the latest AMI when creating instances.

Full Access

Question # 59

A company has proprietary data available by using an Amazon CloudFront distribution. The company needs to ensure that the distribution is accessible by only users from the corporate office that have a known set of IP address ranges. An AWS WAF web ACL is associated with the distribution and has a default action set to Count.

Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?

Create a new regex pattern set. Add the regex pattern set to a new rule group. Create a new web ACL that has a default action set to Block. Associate the web ACL with the CloudFront distribution. Add a rule that allows traffic based on the new rule group.

Create an AWS WAF IP address set that matches the corporate office IP address range. Create a new web ACL that has a default action set to Allow. Associate the web ACL with the CloudFront distribution. Add a rule that allows traffic from the IP address set.

Create a new regex pattern set. Add the regex pattern set to a new rule group. Set the default action on the existing web ACL to Allow. Add a rule that has priority 0 that allows traffic based on the regex pattern set.

Create a WAF IP address set that matches the corporate office IP address range. Set the default action on the existing web ACL to Block. Add a rule that has priority 0 that allows traffic from the IP address set.

Full Access

Question # 60

A DevOps engineer needs to configure an AWS CodePipeline pipeline that publishes container images to an Amazon ECR repository. The pipeline must wait for the previous run to finish and must run when new Git tags are pushed to a Git repository connected to AWS CodeConnections. An existing deployment pipeline must run in response to new container image publications.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Configure a CodePipeline V2 type pipeline that uses QUEUED mode. Add a trigger filter to the pipeline definition that includes all tags. Configure an EventBridge rule that matches container image pushes to start the existing deployment pipeline.

Configure a CodePipeline V2 type pipeline that uses SUPERSEDED mode. Add a trigger filter to the pipeline definition that includes all branches. Configure an EventBridge rule that matches container image pushes to start the existing deployment pipeline.

Configure a CodePipeline V1 type pipeline that uses SUPERSEDED mode. Add a trigger filter to the pipeline definition that includes all tags. Add a stage at the end of the pipeline to invoke the existing deployment pipeline.

Configure a CodePipeline V1 type pipeline that uses QUEUED mode. Add a trigger filter to the pipeline definition that includes all branches. Add a stage at the end of the pipeline to invoke the existing deployment pipeline.

Full Access

Question # 61

A company uses a trunk-based development branching strategy. The company has two AWS CodePipeline pipelines that are integrated with a Git provider. The pull_request pipeline has a branch filter that matches the feature branches. The main_branch pipeline has a branch filter that matches the main branch.

When pull requests are merged into the main branch, the pull requests are deployed by using the main_branch pipeline. The company's developers need test results for all submitted pull requests as quickly as possible from the pull_request pipeline. The company wants to ensure that the main_branch pipeline's test results finish and that each deployment is complete before the next pipeline execution.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Configure the pull_request pipeline to use SUPERSEDED mode. Configure the main_branch pipeline to use QUEUED mode.

Configure the pull_request pipeline to use PARALLEL mode. Configure the main_branch pipeline to use QUEUED mode.

Configure the pull_request pipeline to use PARALLEL mode. Configure the main_branch pipeline to use SUPERSEDED mode.

Configure the pull_request pipeline to use QUEUED mode. Configure the main_branch pipeline to use SUPERSEDED mode.

Full Access

Question # 62

A company has an AWS account named PipelineAccount. The account manages a pipeline in AWS CodePipeline. The account uses an IAM role named CodePipeline_Service_Role and produces an artifact that is stored in an Amazon S3 bucket. The company uses a customer managed AWS KMS key to encrypt objects in the S3 bucket.

A DevOps engineer wants to configure the pipeline to use an AWS CodeDeploy application in an AWS account named CodeDeployAccount to deploy the produced artifact.

The DevOps engineer updates the KMS key policy to grant the CodeDeployAccount account permission to use the key. The DevOps engineer configures an IAM role named DevOps_Role in the CodeDeployAccount account that has access to the CodeDeploy resources that the pipeline requires. The DevOps engineer updates an Amazon EC2 instance role that operates within the CodeDeployAccount account to allow access to the S3 bucket and the KMS key that is in the PipelineAccount account.

Which additional steps will meet these requirements?

Update the S3 bucket policy to grant the CodeDeployAccount account access to the S3 bucket. Configure the DevOps_Role IAM role to have an IAM trust policy that allows the PipelineAccount account to assume the role. Update the CodePipeline_Service_Role IAM role to grant permission to assume the DevOps_Role role.

Update the S3 bucket policy to grant the CodeDeployAccount account access to the S3 bucket. Configure the DevOps_Role IAM role to have an IAM trust policy that allows the PipelineAccount account to assume the role. Update the DevOps_Role IAM role to grant permission to assume CodePipeline_Service_Role role.

Update the S3 bucket policy to grant the PipelineAccount account access to the S3 bucket. Configure the DevOps_Role IAM role to have an IAM trust policy that allows the PipelineAccount account to assume the role. Update the CodePipeline_Service_Role IAM to grant permission to assume the DevOps_Role role.

Update the S3 bucket policy to grant the CodeDeployAccount account access to the S3 bucket. Configure the DevOps_Role IAM role to have an IAM trust policy that allows the CodeDeployAccount account to assume the role. Update the CodePipeline_Service_Role IAM role to grant permission to assume the DevOps_Role role.

Full Access

Question # 63

A company recently launched multiple applications that use Application Load Balancers. Application response time often slows down when the applications experience problems A DevOps engineer needs to Implement a monitoring solution that alerts the company when the applications begin to perform slowly The DevOps engineer creates an Amazon Simple Notification Semce (Amazon SNS) topic and subscribe the company's email address to the topic

What should the DevOps engineer do next to meet the requirements?

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that invokes an AWS Lambda function to query the applications on a 5-minute interval Configure the Lambda function to publish a notification to the SNS topic when the applications return errors.

Create an Amazon CloudWatch Synthetics canary that runs a custom script to query the applications on a 5-minute interval. Configure the canary to use the SNS topic when the applications return errors.

Create an Amazon CloudWatch alarm that uses the AWS/AppljcabonELB namespace RequestCountPerTarget metric Configure the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification when the number of connections becomes greater than the configured number of threads that the application supports Configure the CloudWatch alarm to use the SNS topic.

Create an Amazon CloudWatch alarm that uses the AWS/ApplicationELB namespace RequestCountPerTarget metric Configure the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification when the average response time becomes greater than the longest response time that the application supports Configure the CloudWatch alarm to use the SNS topic

Full Access

Answer:

Explanation:

Option A is incorrect because creating an Amazon EventBridge rule that invokes an AWS Lambda function to query the applications on a 5-minute interval is not a valid solution. EventBridge rules can only trigger Lambda functions based on events, not on time intervals. Moreover, querying the applications on a 5-minute interval might incur unnecessary costs and network overhead, and might not detect performance issues in real time.

Option B is correct because creating an Amazon CloudWatch Synthetics canary that runs a custom script to query the applications on a 5-minute interval is a valid solution. CloudWatch Synthetics canaries are configurable scripts that monitor endpoints and APIs by simulating customer behavior. Canaries can run as often as once per minute, and can measure the latency and availability of the applications.Â Canaries can also send notifications to an Amazon SNS topic when they detect errors or performance issues1.

Option C is incorrect because creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm that uses the AWS/ApplicationELB namespace RequestCountPerTarget metric is not a valid solution.Â The RequestCountPerTarget metric measures the number of requests completed or connections made per target in a target group2. This metric does not reflect the application response time, which is the requirement. Moreover, configuring the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification when the number of connections becomes greater than the configured number of threads that the application supports is not a valid way to measure the application performance, as it depends on the application design and implementation.

Option D is incorrect because creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm that uses the AWS/ApplicationELB namespace RequestCountPerTarget metric is not a valid solution, for the same reason as option C. The RequestCountPerTarget metric does not reflect the application response time, which is the requirement. Moreover, configuring the CloudWatch alarm to send a notification when the average response time becomes greater than the longest response time that the application supports is not a valid way to measure the application performance, as it does not account for variability or outliers in the response time distribution.

[References:, 1:Â Using synthetic monitoring, 2:Â Application Load Balancer metrics, , , ]

Question # 64

A company has configured an Amazon S3 event source on an AWS Lambda function The company needs the Lambda function to run when a new object is created or an existing object IS modified In a particular S3 bucket The Lambda function will use the S3 bucket name and the S3 object key of the incoming event to read the contents of the created or modified S3 object The Lambda function will parse the contents and save the parsed contents to an Amazon DynamoDB table.

The Lambda function's execution role has permissions to read from the S3 bucket and to write to the DynamoDB table, During testing, a DevOps engineer discovers that the Lambda

function does not run when objects are added to the S3 bucket or when existing objects are modified.

Which solution will resolve this problem?

Increase the memory of the Lambda function to give the function the ability to process large files from the S3 bucket.

Create a resource policy on the Lambda function to grant Amazon S3 the permission to invoke the Lambda function for the S3 bucket

Configure an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue as an OnFailure destination for the Lambda function

Provision space in the /tmp folder of the Lambda function to give the function the ability to process large files from the S3 bucket

Full Access

Answer:

Explanation:

Option A is incorrect because increasing the memory of the Lambda function does not address the root cause of the problem, which is that the Lambda function is not triggered by the S3 event source. Increasing the memory of the Lambda function might improve its performance or reduce its execution time, but it does not affect its invocation. Moreover, increasing the memory of the Lambda function might incur higher costs, as Lambda charges based on the amount of memory allocated to the function.

Option B is correct because creating a resource policy on the Lambda function to grant Amazon S3 the permission to invoke the Lambda function for the S3 bucket is a necessary step to configure an S3 event source. A resource policy is a JSON document that defines who can access a Lambda resource and under what conditions.Â By granting Amazon S3 permission to invoke the Lambda function, the company ensures that the Lambda function runs when a new object is created or an existing object is modified in the S3 bucket1.

Option C is incorrect because configuring an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue as an On-Failure destination for the Lambda function does not help with triggering the Lambda function. An On-Failure destination is a feature that allows Lambda to send events to another service, such as SQS or Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS), when a function invocation fails. However, this feature only applies to asynchronous invocations, and S3 event sources use synchronous invocations. Therefore, configuring an SQS queue as an On-Failure destination would have no effect on the problem.

Option D is incorrect because provisioning space in the /tmp folder of the Lambda function does not address the root cause of the problem, which is that the Lambda function is not triggered by the S3 event source. Provisioning space in the /tmp folder of the Lambda function might help with processing large files from the S3 bucket, as it provides temporary storage for up to 512 MB of data. However, it does not affect the invocation of the Lambda function.

[References:, Using AWS Lambda with Amazon S3, Lambda resource access permissions, AWS Lambda destinations, [AWS Lambda file system], , , ]

Go to page: