CT-AI Exam Dumps - ISTQB Certified Tester AI Testing Exam

Pairwise testing is used to handle the large number of combinations of parameters that can arise in complex systems like self-driving cars. The question asks which of the given options isleast likelyto be a reason for the explosion in the number of parameters.

Different Road Types (A): Self-driving cars must operate on various road types, such as highways, city streets, rural roads, etc. Each road type can have different characteristics, requiring the car's system to adapt and handle different scenarios. Thus, this is a significant factor contributing to the growth of parameters.

Different Weather Conditions (B): Weather conditions such as rain, snow, fog, and bright sunlight significantly affect the performance of self-driving cars. The car's sensors and algorithms must adapt to these varying conditions, which adds to the number of parameters that need to be considered.

ML Model Metrics to Evaluate Functional Performance (C): While evaluating machine learning (ML) model performance is crucial, it does not directly contribute to the explosion of parameter combinations in the same way that road types, weather conditions, and car features do. Metrics are used to measure and assess performance but are not themselves variable conditions that the system must handle.

Different Features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance, etc. (D): Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and other features add complexity to self-driving cars. Each feature can have multiple settings and operational modes, contributing to the overall number of parameters.

Hence, theleast likelyreason for the incredible growth in the number of parameters isC. ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance.

The syllabus lists multiple reasons for mislabelled data, including the lack of domain knowledge:

"Lack of required domain knowledge may lead to incorrect labelling."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 4.5.2, page 38 of 99)

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus states in Section2.10 – Explainability, Transparency, and Interpretabilitythat interpretability isuser-dependent, meaning different users understand explanations differently. This is because interpretability depends not only on the ML algorithm but also on the user’s domain knowledge, experience, and expectations. OptionBdirectly reflects this syllabus principle: interpretability testing must consideruser background, and explanations must be comprehensible to the intended user group.

Option A is incorrect because explainability testing requires substantial information about the model, data, and expected behavior—not just exploratory effort. Option C is incorrect because explainability isnotgenerally quantifiable through dynamic testing alone, and the syllabus does not assert model-type specificity in this way. Option D exaggerates LIME’s capabilities. LIME offers approximate local explanations, but cannotpreciselystate root causes; the syllabus emphasizes itslimitationsand that explanations areapproximations, not exact reasons.

Therefore,Option Bis the most syllabus-aligned and correct statement.

The ISTQB CT-AI syllabus describes theML data preparation workflowin Section2.2 – Data Preparation. Data preparation consists ofdata gathering,cleaning,transformation, andsampling. The syllabus emphasizes that one significant challenge duringdata gatheringis combining data frommultiple heterogeneous sources, which often differ in structure, quality, and format. Ensuring the resulting dataset is accurate, complete, and representative can be complex, making this a critical challenge in the ML workflow. This aligns directly with OptionC.

Option A is incorrect because erroneous data correction is part ofcleaning, not transformation. Option B contradicts the syllabus: while automation can help,not all steps should be automateddue to the need for expert oversight, especially in detecting subtle data quality issues. Option D is incorrect because sampling continues to involve risk—particularly around representativeness—and the syllabus emphasizes caution, not complacency.

Thus, OptionCis the only statement that accurately reflects the syllabus.