CISM Exam Dumps - Certified Information Security Manager

Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) allow an organization to measure risk trends and gauge the effectiveness of security governance in real-time. KRIs provide early warning signals and help evaluate whether governance objectives are being met.

“KRIs serve as measurable indicators of potential future risk, essential for monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of information security governance.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Governance Monitoring and Reporting*

Program metrics are helpful, but KRIs are risk-focused and more directly aligned to governance oversight.

= Information classification is the process of assigning appropriate labels to information assets based on their sensitivity and value to the organization. Information classification should be aligned with the business objectives and risk appetite of the organization, and should be reviewed periodically to ensure its accuracy and relevance. The information security manager is responsible for establishing and maintaining the information classification policy and procedures, as well as providing guidance and oversight to the data owners and custodians. Data owners are the individuals who have the authority and accountability for the information assets within their business unit or function. Data owners are responsible for determining the appropriate classification level and security controls for their information assets, as well as ensuring compliance with the information classification policy and procedures. Data custodians are the individuals who have the operational responsibility for implementing and maintaining the security controls for the information assets assigned to them by the data owners.

If the information security manager believes that information has been classified inappropriately, increasing the risk of a breach, the best action is to complete a risk assessment and refer the results to the data owners. A risk assessment is a systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the risks associated with the information assets, and recommending appropriate risk treatment options. By conducting a risk assessment, the information security manager can provide objective and evidence-based information to the data owners, highlighting the potential impact and likelihood of a breach, as well as the cost and benefit of implementing additional security controls. This will enable the data owners to make informed decisions about the appropriate classification level and security controls for their information assets, and to justify and document any deviations from the information classification policy and procedures.

The other options are not the best actions for the information security manager. Refering the issue to internal audit for a recommendation is not the best action, because internal audit is an independent and objective assurance function that provides assurance on the effectiveness of governance, risk management, and control processes. Internal audit is not responsible for providing recommendations on information classification, which is a management responsibility. Re-classifying the data and increasing the security level to meet business risk is not the best action, because the information security manager does not have the authority or accountability for the information assets, and may not have the full understanding of the business context and objectives of the data owners. Instructing the relevant system owners to reclassify the data is not the best action, because system owners are not the same as data owners, and may not have the authority or accountability for the information assets either. System owners are the individuals who have the authority and accountability for the information systems that process, store, or transmit the information assets. System owners are responsible for ensuring that the information systems comply with the security requirements and controls defined by the data owners and the information security manager. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, pp. 49-51, 63-64, 69-701; CISM Online Review Course, Domain 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Module 2: Information Security Program Framework, ISACA2

Communicating and enforcing policies demonstrates leadership commitment and drives behavior across the organization, fostering a culture of security.

“Policies must be effectively communicated and enforced to influence culture and employee behavior.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Security Culture*

The primary role of an information security manager in a software development project is to assess and approve the security application architecture. The security application architecture is the design and structure of the software application that defines how the application components interact with each other and with external systems, and how the application implements the security requirements, principles, and best practices. The information security manager is responsible for ensuring that the security application architecture is aligned with the organization’s information security policies, standards, and guidelines, and that it meets the business objectives, functional specifications, and user expectations. The information security manager is also responsible for reviewing and evaluating the security application architecture for its completeness, correctness, consistency, and compliance, and for identifying and resolving any security issues, risks, or gaps. The information security manager is also responsible for approving the security application architecture before the software development project proceeds to the next phase, such as coding, testing, or deployment.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Development, page 1581; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 80, page 742.

When outsourcing to a cloud provider, regulatory compliance is paramount—especially with sensitive or proprietary applications. Non-compliance could result in legal penalties, fines, or reputational damage.

While RPOs, SLAs, and contract clauses are critical components of vendor risk management, ensuring adherence to relevant laws and industry regulations (such as GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS) is the first priority in cloud migration decisions.

“Prior to selecting a cloud provider, legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements must be reviewed to ensure alignment.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Compliance Considerations in Cloud Computing*

The most important information for influencing management’s support of information security is an demonstration of alignment with the business strategy because it shows how information security contributes to the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives, and adds value to the organization’s performance and competitiveness. An identification of the overall threat landscape is not very important because it does not indicate how information security addresses or mitigates the threats or risks. A report of a successful attack on a competitor is not very important because it does not indicate how information security prevents or responds to such attacks. An identification of organizational risks is not very important because it does not indicate how information security manages or reduces the risks. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-4/technical-security-standards-for-information-systems https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-2/how-to-align-security-initiatives-with-business-goals-and-objectives