CISA Exam Dumps - Certified Information Systems Auditor

A top-down approach in the development of IT policies means that the policies are derived from the strategic objectives and goals of the organization, and are aligned with the business needs and expectations. This should result in greater consistency across the organization, as the policies will be coherent, integrated and applicable to all levels and functions of the organization. A bottom-up approach, on the other hand, means that the policies are developed by individual units or departments based on their operational needs and preferences, which may lead to inconsistency, duplication orconflict among different policies. References: ISACA Frameworks: Blueprints for Success, IT Governance and Process Maturity

When an IS auditor discovers a security weakness in the database configuration, the next course of action should be to identify existing mitigating controls. This involves assessing whether any controls are already in place to address the weakness and mitigate the risk. Understanding the current state of controls helps the auditor determine the severity of the issue and whether additional corrective actions are necessary1. References: 1(https://www.isaca.org/resources/insights-and-expertise/audit-programs-and-tools)

A post-incident review (PIR) is a process to review the incident information from occurrence to closure and to identify potential findings and recommendations for improvement1. The most important reason for an IS auditor to examine the results of a PIR is to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous improvement efforts and to ensure that the lessons learned from the incident are implemented and followed up2. A PIR can help an organization to eliminate or reduce the risk of the incident to re-occur, improve the initial incident detection time, identify improvements needed to diagnose and repair the incident, and update the incident management best practices1. Therefore, a PIR is a valuable source of information for an IS auditor to assess the maturity and performance of the organization’s incident management process.

 The most effective control over visitor access to highly secured areas is to require visitors to be escorted by authorized personnel. This control ensures that visitors are supervised at all times and do not enter any restricted or sensitive areas without permission. It also allows authorized personnel to verify the identity, purpose, and clearance of the visitors, and to monitor their behavior and activities. Escorting visitors also reduces the risk of tailgating, piggybacking, or unauthorized duplication of access credentials.

Requiring visitors to use biometric authentication, monitoring visitors online by security cameras, and requiring visitors to enter through dead-man doors are all examples of technical controls that can enhance visitor access control, but they are not as effective as escorting visitors. Biometric authentication can provide a high level of identity verification, but it does not prevent visitors from accessing unauthorized areas or compromising security in other ways. Security cameras can provide a record of visitor movements and actions, but they may not deter or detect security breaches in real time. Dead-man doors can prevent unauthorized entry by requiring two-factor authentication, but they do not ensure that visitors are accompanied by authorized personnel.

This is because the auditor’s primary objective is to evaluate the adequacy and performance of the business continuity plan (BCP) in ensuring the continuity and resilience of the organization’s critical functions and processesduring a disruption. The auditor should review the actual results and outcomes of the business response, such as the recovery time, recovery point, service level, customer satisfaction, and incident management, and compare them with the predefined objectives and criteria of the BCP. The auditor should also identify and analyze any gaps, issues, or lessons learned from the business response, and provide recommendations for improvement12.

Answer A. Confirm the BCP has been recently updated. is not the best answer, because it is not directly related to the auditor’s course of action. Confirming the BCP has been recently updated is a part of the audit planning and scoping process, not the audit execution or reporting process. The auditor should confirm the BCP has been recently updated before conducting the audit, not after revealing that a simulation test has not been performed. Moreover, confirming the BCP has been recently updated does not provide sufficient evidence of the effectiveness of the business response12.

Answer C. Raise an audit issue for the lack of simulated testing. is not the best answer, because it is not relevant to the auditor’s course of action. Raising an audit issue for the lack of simulated testing is a part of the audit reporting and follow-up process, not the audit execution or evaluation process. The auditor should raise an audit issue for the lack of simulated testing after reviewing the effectiveness of the business response, not before or instead of doing so. Furthermore, raising an audit issue for the lack of simulated testing does not address the root cause or impact of the problem, nor does it provide any constructive feedback or guidance for improvement12.

Answer D. Interview staff members to obtain commentary on the BCP’s effectiveness. is not the best answer, because it is not sufficient to guide the auditor’s course of action. Interviewing staff members to obtain commentary on the BCP’s effectiveness is a part of the audit evidence collection and analysis process, not the audit evaluation or conclusion process. The auditor should interview staff members to obtain commentary on the BCP’s effectiveness as one of the sources of information, not as the only or main source of information. Additionally, interviewing staff members to obtain commentary on the BCP’s effectiveness may be subjective, biased, or incomplete, and may not reflect the actual performance or outcomes of the business response12.

When assessing the scope of privacy concerns for an IT project, the most important factor to consider is the applicable laws and regulations. These laws and regulations define the legal requirements for data privacy and protection that the project must comply with. They can vary greatly depending on the jurisdiction and the type of data being processed, and non-compliance can result in significant penalties123. While data ownership, business requirements and data flows, and end-user access rights are also important considerations, they are typically guided by these legal requirements.

Post-implementation testing is the process of verifying and validating the functionality, performance, and security of a system after it has been deployed to the production environment1. Post-implementation testing is important for ensuring that the system meets the user requirements and expectations, as well as the operational and business objectives. Post-implementation testing also helps to identify and resolve any defects, errors, or issues that may have occurred during the deployment process or that may have been missed during the previous testing stages2.

Therefore, the observation that post-implementation testing is not conducted for all system releases should be of greatest concern to an IS auditor performing an audit of change and release management controls for a new complex system developed by a small in-house IT team. This observation indicates that the system may have quality, reliability, or security problems that could affect the user satisfaction, system performance, or data integrity. This observation also suggests that the change and release management controls are not adequate or effective, as they do not ensure that all system releases are properly tested and validated before and after deployment.

Option A is not correct because access to change testing strategy and results is not restricted to staff outside the IT team is not a major concern for an IS auditor. While it is good practice to limit access to sensitive or confidential information, such as test data or test cases, to authorized personnel only, access to change testing strategy and results may not pose a significant risk to the system or the organization. Moreover, access to change testing strategy and results may be beneficial for some stakeholders outside the IT team, such as business users, project managers, or auditors, who may need to review or evaluate the testing process or outcomes.

Option B is not correct because some user acceptance testing (UAT) was completed by members of the IT team is not a major concern for an IS auditor. User acceptance testing is the process of verifying and validating that the system meets the user requirements and expectations by involving actual or representative users in the testing process3. While it is preferable to have independent and unbiased users perform UAT, it may not be feasible or practical for some organizations, especially those with small or limited resources. Therefore, some UAT may be completed by members of the IT team, as long as they have sufficient knowledge and experience of the user needs and expectations, and as long as they follow the UAT plan and criteria.

Option C is not correct because IT administrators have access to the production and development environment is not a major concern for an IS auditor. IT administrators are responsible for managing and maintaining the IT infrastructure, including the production and development environments4. Therefore, it is reasonable and necessary for them to have access to both environments, as long as they follow the appropriate policies and procedures for accessing, using, and securing them. Moreover, IT administrators may need to perform tasks such as backup, restore, patching, or troubleshooting in both environments.

The recovery time objective (RTO) is the most important consideration when making a decision to invest in a hot site due to service criticality. The RTO is the maximum acceptable time that an IT service or process can be unavailable or disrupted before it causes significant damage to the business operations and objectives. A hot site is a fully equipped and operational backup facility that can be activated immediately in the event of a disaster or disruption. A hot site can help an organization achieve a very low RTO, as it can resume the service with minimal or no downtime. The maximum tolerable downtime (MTD) is the maximum acceptable time that an IT service or process can be unavailable or disrupted before it causes intolerable damage to the business operations and objectives. The MTD is usually longer than the RTO, as it represents the worst-case scenario. The recovery point objective (RPO) is the maximum acceptable amount of data loss that an IT service or process can tolerate in the event of a disaster or disruption. The RPO is measured in terms of time, such as hours or minutes, and indicates how frequently the data should be backed up or replicated. The mean time to repair (MTTR) is the average time that it takes to restore an IT service or process after a failure or disruption. The MTTR is a measure of the efficiency and effectiveness of the recovery process, but it does not reflect the service criticality or the business impact. References: IS Audit and Assurance Tools and Techniques, CISA Certification | Certified Information Systems Auditor | ISACA