CGFM Exam Dumps - CGFM Certified Government Financial Manager

Compliance Reporting Under Government Auditing Standards (GAS):

GAS requires auditors to assess compliance with applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements during audits.

Compliance reporting typically includes:

Identifying areas of noncompliance.

Describing the auditor's responsibility for compliance testing.

Outlining the scope of compliance testing.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Areas of noncompliance: Included in compliance reporting to highlight where the entity failed to meet requirements.

B. The auditor's responsibility for tests of compliance: GAS requires auditors to clarify their role in compliance testing.

C. Review of major internal control cycles: Correct. While internal controls may be assessed, reviewing "major internal control cycles" is not a direct component of compliance reporting.

D. The scope of the compliance testing: GAS mandates that the scope of testing be disclosed in the compliance report.

References:

GAO,Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book).

AICPA,Compliance Reporting Guidance for Government Audits.

ï‚·What Are We Solving For?

We are calculating thepresent value (PV)of $20,550 to be received at theend of year 2using a discount rate of10%.

The formula for present value is: PV=FV(1+r)nPV = \frac{FV}{(1 + r)^n}PV=(1+r)nFV​ Where:

FVFVFV = Future Value = $20,550

rrr = Discount Rate = 10% or 0.10

nnn = Time Period = 2 years

ï‚·Calculation:

PV=20,550(1+0.10)2PV = \frac{20,550}{(1 + 0.10)^2}PV=(1+0.10)220,550​ PV=20,550(1.10)2PV = \frac{20,550}{(1.10)^2}PV=(1.10)220,550​ PV=20,5501.21PV = \frac{20,550}{1.21}PV=1.2120,550​ PV≈16,983PV ≈ 16,983PV≈16,983

ï‚·Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. $16,440:Results from incorrect discounting for one year instead of two.

C. $18,495:Results from applying a lower discount rate or an incorrect formula.

D. $20,550:This is the future value, not the present value.

ï‚·References and Documents:

GAO Financial Analysis Guide:Explains present value calculations for investment decision-making.

AICPA Present Value Guidelines:Provides step-by-step guidance on time value of money calculations.

ï‚·Role of Management in Internal Control Evaluation:

Responsibility for Risk Identification:Management has the primary responsibility for designing, implementing, and maintaining an effective system of internal controls. As part of this process, management identifies the risks related to fraud, waste, and abuse that could impact financial reporting or operational efficiency.

Mitigating Risks:Once risks are identified, management is responsible for mitigating them by developing appropriate policies, procedures, and controls.

ï‚·Role of the Auditor in Internal Control Evaluation:

Assessing Control Effectiveness:Auditors are not responsible for designing or implementing controls; rather, their role is to evaluate whether the controls put in place by management are effective. They do this through testing, observation, and other audit procedures.

Fraud Risk Assessment:As part of their duties under Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS), auditors must assess the risk of material misstatement due to fraud and evaluate how management’s controls address those risks.

ï‚·Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B.Auditors do not identify risks—this is management's job. Auditors evaluate and assess the controls already in place.

C.Determining risk tolerance is a governance and management responsibility, not the joint responsibility of auditors and management.

D.Management mitigates risks, but auditors don’t monitor compliance with controls—they test and evaluate the controls as part of their audit procedures.

ï‚·References and Documents:

GAGAS (Yellow Book) by GAO:Emphasizes management’s responsibility for risk identification and the auditor’s responsibility for assessing control effectiveness.

COSO Internal Control Framework (2013):Highlights management’s responsibility for risk assessment and control design, while auditors provide independent assurance.

Limiting Public Reporting in Attestation Engagements:

Government auditing standards allow auditors to limit public reporting in rare cases, such as when disclosing certain information could compromise sensitive or ongoing legal proceedings.

The goal is to protect the integrity of investigations or legal actions while maintaining transparency where possible.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Auditors detect material fraud: Auditors are required to report material fraud to appropriate authorities, not limit reporting unless legal proceedings are affected.

B. Audit report would compromise ongoing legal proceedings: Correct. This is a valid reason to limit public reporting under auditing standards.

C. Auditor detects non-compliance with provisions of law: Non-compliance must be disclosed unless legal considerations warrant confidentiality.

D. Entity management fails to satisfy legal requirements: This would typically be reported, not withheld.

References:

GAO,Government Auditing Standards (Yellow Book).

AICPA,Attestation Standards and Public Reporting Guidance.

ï‚·What Are Material Weaknesses?

Amaterial weaknessin internal control is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies that creates a reasonable possibility of a material misstatement in the financial statements that would not be prevented or detected in a timely manner.

In the context of state and local financial audits, material weaknesses must be reported to those charged with governance, as they are responsible for oversight and corrective actions.

ï‚·Why Is the Governing Body the Correct Answer?

Thegoverning body(e.g., city council, county board, or state commission) is directly responsible for overseeing the entity’s financial operations and ensuring accountability. Reporting material weaknesses to them ensures that corrective actions can be implemented to strengthen internal controls.

Auditors communicate such findings through anaudit reportor amanagement letteraddressed to the governing body.

ï‚·Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Legislature:The legislature may have oversight of state budgets and appropriations but is not the direct governing body for financial audits.

C. Taxpayers:While transparency is important, material weaknesses are not directly reported to taxpayers. They may be disclosed in public audit reports, but taxpayers are not the primary audience.

D. Local media:Material weaknesses are not formally reported to the media; their disclosure depends on the entity’s public reporting processes.

ï‚·References and Documents:

GAO Yellow Book (GAGAS):Requires auditors to report material weaknesses to those charged with governance.

GASB (Governmental Accounting Standards Board):Emphasizes the importance of communicating significant audit findings to governing bodies.

AICPA Audit Standards (AU-C 265):Requires auditors to communicate material weaknesses to management and those charged with governance.

Collusion as a Threat to Monitoring:

Collusion occurs when two or more individuals work together to circumvent internal controls.

Even with strong controls in place, collusion can undermine monitoring because it allows individuals to bypass controls without detection.

Explanation of Answer Choices:

A. Theft has occurred: Incorrect. While theft is a problem, it is often detected if controls and monitoring are functioning properly.

B. Financial data is inaccurate: Incorrect. Inaccurate financial data can compromise decision-making, but strong monitoring can help detect and correct errors.

C. Performance data is inaccurate: Incorrect. While inaccurate performance data is problematic, it does not directly compromise the monitoring of financial control weaknesses.

D. Collusion is present: Correct. Collusion is the most significant threat because it undermines the effectiveness of internal controls and makes monitoring ineffective.

References:

GAO,Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government (Green Book).

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE),Fraud Risk Management Framework.

ï‚·What Is an Outcome Measure?

Anoutcome measureevaluates the results or impacts of a program or service, focusing on whether objectives were achieved (e.g., efficiency, effectiveness, or quality).

Percentage of disaster claims paid on timedirectly reflects the program’s ability to meet its goal of providing timely financial assistance to disaster victims, making it an outcome measure.

ï‚·Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Amount of disability inquiries received during a pandemic:This is aninput measure, as it reflects the demand or workload, not the results.

B. Total environmental impact statements reviewed:This is anoutput measure, showing the quantity of work done, not the effectiveness or result.

C. Number of federal capital territory students that graduated:While this measures results, it reflects an output rather than an outcome (it doesn’t assess the quality or long-term impact of education).

ï‚·References and Documents:

Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA):Emphasizes the use of outcome measures to evaluate program performance.

GAO Performance Measurement Guide:Defines and provides examples of outcome, output, and input measures.

Understanding the Scenario:The table compares the costs of four printing jobs performed by an "Internal Print Shop" versus three external vendors (Ace Printing, ABC Printing, and Printing, Inc.). Eachvendor's pricing varies by print job type. The task is to evaluate whether outsourcing (hiring external vendors) is a reasonable alternative to keeping the work in-house.

Key Considerations in Outsourcing:According to governmental accounting principles and budgeting practices outlined by theAssociation of Government Accountants (AGA), the decision to outsource should consider:

Cost-effectiveness: Does outsourcing reduce costs without compromising quality or service delivery?

Operational efficiency: Can outsourcing free up internal resources for other priorities?

Comparative pricing: How do external vendor rates compare to internal costs for identical services?

Analysis of the Print Jobs:Let’s break down the cost comparison for each print job:

Zone Map:Internal cost = $4.23.Cheapest vendor = Printing, Inc., at $4.00.Outsourcing is cheaper for this job.

Agenda Packet:Internal cost = $23.18.Cheapest vendor = Printing, Inc., at $22.00.Outsourcing is cheaper for this job.

Budget Cover:Internal cost = $840.00.Cheapest vendor = ABC Printing, at $624.30.Outsourcing is significantly cheaper for this job.

Employee Benefit Brochure:Internal cost = $6.14.Cheapest vendor = ABC Printing, at $4.90.Outsourcing is cheaper for this job.

Conclusion Based on Analysis:

Across all four print jobs, the lowest-cost external vendor always beats the Internal Print Shop's costs.

From abudgetary perspective, outsourcing is feasible as it offers cost savings across all jobs.

Why Not A, C, or D?:

Option A(Keep printing in-house): Incorrect, as in-house costs are consistently higher than the cheapest external vendor.

Option C(Outsourcing is necessary): Incorrect, as feasibility doesn’t mean necessity; internal printing is still an option if other factors (like quality or control) outweigh costs.

Option D(Award contract to ABC Printing): Incorrect, since the best vendor depends on the job (e.g., Printing, Inc. is cheaper for Zone Map and Agenda Packet).

References:

Association of Government Accountants (AGA),Government Financial Manager Certification Study Guide: Budgeting, Cost Accounting, and Auditing Principles.

Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA),Best Practices in Outsourcing and Procurement.

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB),Cost Accounting Standards for Governmental Operations.