AIF-C01 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified AI Practitioner Exam

The company wants to improve the accuracy of a generative AI application using a foundation model (FM) on Amazon Bedrock in the most cost-effective way. Prompt engineering involves optimizing the input prompts to guide the FM to produce more accurate responses without modifying the model itself. This approach is cost-effective because it does not require additional computational resources or training, unlike fine-tuning or retraining.

Exact Extract from AWS AI Documents:

From the AWS Bedrock User Guide:

"Prompt engineering is a cost-effective technique to improve the performance of foundation models. By crafting precise and context-rich prompts, users can guide the model to generate more accurate and relevant responses without the need for fine-tuning or retraining."

(Source: AWS Bedrock User Guide, Prompt Engineering for Foundation Models)

Detailed Explanation:

Option A: Fine-tune the FM.Fine-tuning involves retraining the FM on a custom dataset, which requirescomputational resources, time, and cost (e.g., for Amazon Bedrock fine-tuning jobs). It is not the most cost-effective solution.

Option B: Retrain the FM.Retraining an FM from scratch is highly resource-intensive and expensive, as it requires large datasets and significant compute power. This is not cost-effective.

Option C: Train a new FM.Training a new FM is the most expensive option, as it involves building a model from the ground up, requiring extensive data, compute resources, and expertise. This is not cost-effective.

Option D: Use prompt engineering.This is the correct answer. Prompt engineering adjusts the input prompts to improve the FM’s responses without incurring additional compute costs, making it the most cost-effective solution for improving accuracy on Amazon Bedrock.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In a RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) architecture, there are steps that can be optimized using offline batch processing, particularly for operations that do not require real-time updates:

A. Generation of content embeddings:When new content is published, it can be processed in batches to generate embeddings (vector representations) offline. These embeddings are then used at query time for similarity search. As new documents come in daily, batch processing is ideal for generating embeddings for all new content together.

“Content/document embeddings are typically generated offline, as this operation can be computationally expensive and does not need to happen in real-time.”

(Reference: AWS GenAI RAG Blog, Amazon Bedrock RAG Pattern)

C. Creation of the search index:After generating the content embeddings, these are indexed in a vector database or search service. This indexing is also typically performed in batch as part of the offline pipeline.

“Building or updating the vector index is often performed as a batch operation, reflecting the latest state of the content repository.”

(Reference: AWS RAG Pattern Whitepaper)

B, D, and E are real-time steps. Embeddings for user queries (B), retrieval of relevant content (D), and response generation (E) must be processed in real-time to provide an interactive experience.

The requirement is to identify an AWS database service that supports the storage and querying of embeddings (from a generative AI model) as vectors. Embeddings are typically high-dimensional numerical representations of data (e.g., text, images) used in AI applications like conversational search. The database must support vector storage and efficient vector similarity searches. Let’s evaluate each option:

A. Amazon Athena: Amazon Athena is a serverless query service for analyzing data in Amazon S3 using SQL. It is designed for ad-hoc querying of structured data but does not natively support vector storage or vector similarity searches, making it unsuitable for this use case.

B. Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL: Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL is a fully managed relational database compatible with PostgreSQL. With the pgvector extension (available in PostgreSQL and supported by Aurora PostgreSQL), it can store and query vector embeddings efficiently. The pgvector extension enables vector similarity searches (e.g., using cosine similarity or Euclidean distance), which is critical for conversational search applications using embeddings from generative AI models.

C. Amazon Redshift: Amazon Redshift is a data warehousing service optimized for analytical queries on large datasets. While it supports machine learning features and can store numerical data, it does not have native support for vector embeddings or vector similarity searches as of May 17, 2025, making it less suitable for this use case.

D. Amazon EMR: Amazon EMR is a managed big data platform for processing large-scale data using frameworks like Apache Hadoop and Spark. It is not a database service and is not designed for storing or querying vector embeddings in the context of a conversational search application.

Exact Extract Reference: According to the AWS documentation, “Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL-Compatible Edition supports the pgvector extension, which enables efficient storage and similarity searches for vector embeddings. This makes it suitable for AI/ML workloads such as natural language processing and recommendation systems that rely on vector data.” (Source: AWS Aurora Documentation - Using pgvector with Aurora PostgreSQL, https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/PostgreSQLpgvector.html). Additionally, the pgvector extension supports operations like nearest-neighbor searches, which are essential for querying embeddings in a conversational search system.

Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL with the pgvector extension directly meets the requirement for storing and querying embeddings as vectors, making B the correct answer.

AWS KMS provides customer-managed encryption keys (CMKs) that can be used to encrypt model artifacts and other sensitive data at rest.

Bedrock integrates with AWS KMS to allow encryption of customized models with your own keys.

Amazon Inspector is for vulnerability scanning, Amazon Macie for sensitive data discovery, AWS Secrets Manager for storing credentials and secrets.

📖 Reference:

AWS Documentation – Using KMS with Amazon Bedrock

An anomaly detection system is suitable for identifying unusual patterns or behaviors, such as suspicious IP addresses, which might indicate a potential threat.

Anomaly Detection:

Anomaly detection uses machine learning algorithms to identify deviations from normal behavior, such as unexpected traffic from a suspicious IP address.

This is a common approach for identifying potential threats or malicious activity in cybersecurity applications.

Why Option C is Correct:

Detects Suspicious Behavior: An anomaly detection system can monitor and detect IP addresses that exhibit unusual or suspicious patterns.

Real-time Monitoring: Provides continuous analysis of network traffic to identify potential security threats.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A. Speech recognition system: Is unrelated to detecting suspicious IP addresses.

B. NLP named entity recognition: Focuses on identifying entities in text, not IP address analysis.

D. Fraud forecasting system: Generally used for predicting fraud, not directly applicable to identifying suspicious IPs.

Thus, C is the correct answer for detecting suspicious IP addresses.