AI-102 Exam Dumps - Designing and Implementing a Microsoft Azure AI Solution

Box 1: " categories " : [ " Locations " , " Persons " , " Organizations " ],

Locations, Persons, Organizations are in the outputs.

Scenario: Contoso plans to develop a searchable knowledgebase of all the intellectual property

Note: The categories parameter is an array of categories that should be extracted. Possible category types: " Person " , " Location " , " Organization " , " Quantity " , " Datetime " , " URL " , " Email " . If no category is provided, all types are returned.

Box 2: { " name " : " entities " }

The include wikis, so should include entities in the outputs.

Note: entities is an array of complex types that contains rich information about the entities extracted from text, with the following fields

name (the actual entity name. This represents a " normalized " form)

wikipediaId

wikipediaLanguage

wikipediaUrl (a link to Wikipedia page for the entity)

etc.

Scenario: When the response confidence score is low, ensure that the chatbot can provide other response options to the customers.

When no good match is found by the ranker, the confidence score of 0.0 or " None " is returned and the default response is " No good match found in the KB " . You can override this default response in the bot or application code calling the endpoint. Alternately, you can also set the override response in Azure and this changes the default for all knowledge bases deployed in a particular QnA Maker service.

Choosing Ranker type: By default, QnA Maker searches through questions and answers. If you want to search through questions only, to generate an answer, use the RankerType=QuestionOnly in the POST body of the GenerateAnswer request.

Can search content in different formats, including video

Audio and video insights (multi-channels). When indexing by one channel, partial result for those models will be available.

Keywords extraction: Extracts keywords from speech and visual text.

Named entities extraction: Extracts brands, locations, and people from speech and visual text via natural language processing (NLP).

Topic inference: Makes inference of main topics from transcripts. The 2nd-level IPTC taxonomy is included.

Artifacts: Extracts rich set of " next level of details " artifacts for each of the models.

Sentiment analysis: Identifies positive, negative, and neutral sentiments from speech and visual text.

Scenario: All planned projects must support English, French, and Portuguese.

If a bot uses multiple LUIS models and QnA Maker knowledge bases (knowledge bases), you can use the Dispatch tool to determine which LUIS model or QnA Maker knowledge base best matches the user input. The dispatch tool does this by creating a single LUIS app to route user input to the correct model.

The requirements state:

All AI solution responses must have a confidence score ≥ 70%.

If the response confidence score is < 70%, the response must be improved by human input.

Members of the Consultant-Bookkeeper group must be able to process financial documents, which includes performing manual review when the AI confidence is below threshold.

Looking at the provided JSON:

" fields " : {

" ReceiptType " : {

" type " : " string " ,

" valueString " : " Itemized " ,

" confidence " : 0.672

},

" MerchantName " : {

" type " : " string " ,

" valueString " : " Tailwind " ,

" confidence " : 0.913

}

}

ReceiptType.confidence = 0.672 → this is below 0.7.

MerchantName.confidence = 0.913 → this is above 0.7.

Therefore, the correct condition for triggering manual review is:

documentResults.fields. < field > .confidence < 0.7

Now, evaluating the options:

A. documentResults.docType == " prebuilt:receipt "

Always true for receipts, does not check confidence. Not correct.

B. documentResults.fields.*.confidence < 0.7

This is the correct general expression: trigger manual review whenever any field confidence is below 0.7.

C. documentResults.fields.ReceiptType.confidence > 0.7

This would bypass manual review when ReceiptType has high confidence. The requirement is to trigger review when confidence < 0.7, so this is the opposite.

D. documentResults.fields.MerchantName.confidence < 0.7

This only checks one field (MerchantName). In the JSON, MerchantName has confidence 0.913 ( > 0.7), so this condition would not trigger, but ReceiptType clearly needs review. Too narrow.

Correct Answer: B. documentResults.fields.*.confidence < 0.7

Microsoft References

Azure AI Document Intelligence – Confidence scores

Human-in-the-loop for Document Intelligence