AB-210 Exam Dumps - Accelerating Sales Pipelines with AI in Dynamics 365

The correct answer is Rounding Amount . In Dynamics 365 Sales price list item configuration, rounding is used when calculated prices must follow a specific price-ending convention, such as ending in .98 or .99 . Microsoft’s pricing guidance explains that price list items can use rounding behavior so calculated product prices can be rounded and made to end in a specified amount, such as 99 cents. The value that defines the exact ending amount is the Rounding Amount . Therefore, to make all calculated prices end in $.98 , the administrator would configure the rounding amount as 0.98 .

Rounding Policy is not precise enough by itself. It controls the direction of rounding, such as rounding up, down, or to the nearest value, but it does not define the exact cents-ending requirement. Pricing Method determines how the price is calculated, such as a currency amount, percentage of list price, markup, or margin. Percentage is used when a percentage-based pricing method is selected, but it does not force prices to end in $.98 . The requirement is explicitly about the final rounded price ending, so Rounding Amount is the correct function.

References/topics: Price lists; price list items; rounding amount; rounding policy; Dynamics 365 Sales product pricing.

The required fix is about visibility and security , not agent operating mode. In the scenario, production has EnableRoleBasedSystemViews set to true, which restricts system views based on role configuration. Because the business requirement says all sellers should be able to access disqualified leads , the role-based system view setting must be updated so sellers can access the view that exposes leads disqualified by the Sales Qualification Agent.

The second required action is to change Lead table permissions. The customized Salesperson role currently grants sellers read access only to leads they own. That is too restrictive because leads disqualified by the Sales Qualification Agent may not be owned by each seller. To let all sellers view those records, sellers need organization-level Read permission on the Lead table. Option A is wrong because upgrading the agent to research and engage mode affects how the agent researches and interacts with leads; it does not solve seller access to disqualified records. Option C is also wrong because the look-back period controls which historical leads the agent evaluates, not who can view disqualified leads.

References/topics: Sales Qualification Agent; role-based system views; Dataverse security roles; Lead table read access; AI-driven lead qualification.

Requirement

Configuration

Blueprints

Name the blueprint workspace and pin the workspace.

Questions

Create a business function with seeded prompts.

For Blueprints, the correct configuration is to name the blueprint workspace and pin the workspace. The requirement is not asking to regenerate analysis; it asks for a reliable way to return to frequently used research output. In Sales Research Agent, a generated blueprint exists inside a workspace, and Microsoft states that the workspace displays the workspace name, can be renamed, and can be switched from the workspace menu. That makes naming and pinning the workspace the correct operational pattern for reusable research access.

For Questions, the correct configuration is to create a business function with seeded prompts. Sales Research Agent business functions are designed to tailor research to a specific use case, and administrators can add starter prompts. Microsoft explains that starter prompts appear on the Sales Research Agent home page for quick access and that the full prompt is sent to the agent when selected. This directly satisfies the requirement to retain a reusable library of approved questions.

Do not select regenerate the blueprint because regeneration refreshes or recreates analysis, but it does not create a persistent shortcut to frequently used research. Do not select custom table or manual prompt questions in Sales Copilot because the native Sales Research Agent feature already supports reusable business-function prompts.

References/topics: Sales Research Agent; research blueprints; workspace management; business functions; seeded/starter prompts; intelligent opportunity research.

The issue is that the sales manager already generated a Sales Research Agent blueprint but forgot to include the quarterly competitive intelligence brief. The brief is an external document and the case study states it is delivered as a PDF document , so the correct first content action is to upload the competitive intelligence brief as a PDF file , not CSV. Microsoft’s Sales Research Agent documentation states that users can select Add data to upload files including CSV, Excel, or PDF to augment research with additional data.

The second required action is to add a data source , because the competitive intelligence brief is not part of the default Dynamics 365 Sales data. Sales Research Agent connects to Dynamics 365 Sales data by default, but additional external files must be added as supporting data sources before they can influence the analysis. The documentation identifies the Data area as the place where the research data source is specified and where additional data sources can be added.

The final action is to regenerate the canvas/blueprint so the agent reprocesses the analysis using the newly added PDF. Refreshing alone is not the best answer because the problem is not stale data; it is missing context. Regeneration creates updated research output with the new source included.

References/topics: Sales Research Agent; research canvas; adding PDF data sources; blueprint regeneration; intelligent opportunity research.

Requirement

Configuration

Advance the lead to the Development stage

Set the decision maker field as required.

Ensure that the default process is applied

Authorize the process for field sellers.

The lead qualification process should be controlled through the Lead to Opportunity Business Process Flow, because the case study states that field sellers use this existing process to manage leads. To prevent a lead from advancing to the Development stage until a decision maker is confirmed, configure the Decision Maker step as required in the business process flow. Microsoft’s business process flow guidance states that each stage contains steps mapped to columns, and a step can be made required so users must enter data before moving to the next stage. This stage-gating behavior directly satisfies the requirement that leads cannot progress until the decision maker is confirmed.

To ensure the correct process is applied for field sellers, authorize the business process flow for the field seller security role. Microsoft explains that business process flows can be associated with security roles so only users with those roles can view or use them, and that the first active process available for a user’s security role is applied by default according to process order.

Do not choose Power Automate to advance the lead; the requirement is to block advancement until a required qualification criterion is completed, not to automate progression. “Switch to a different process” is user action, not a configuration standard.

References/topics: Business process flows; stage-gating; Lead to Opportunity Sales Process; security role authorization; seller workflow standardization.