1z0-1080-25 Exam Dumps - Oracle Planning 2025 Implementation Professional

In Oracle Planning 2024, the Dimensions page in a Custom Planning application allows administrators to manage dimensions. The three tasks you can perform are:

A. Set the order of precedence: Correct. This task adjusts the display order of dimensions in forms and reports, enhancing usability, and is manageable on the Dimensions page.

B. Delete dimensions: Correct. Administrators can delete custom dimensions from the application on the Dimensions page, provided they are not in use (e.g., no data or dependencies).

C. Clear dimension members: Incorrect. Clearing members (e.g., removing all members from a dimension) is not a task performed on the Dimensions page; it’s typically done via metadata import with the "Clear Members" option or manual member deletion.

D. Select the dimension density: Incorrect. Dimension density (sparse/dense) is set during cube creation or in Cube Designer, not adjustable on the Dimensions page post-creation.

E. Set the Evaluation Order: Correct. This task defines the order in which dimensions are evaluated for calculations (e.g., resolving member formulas), configurable on the Dimensions page for custom applications.

The Oracle documentation confirms that A, B, and E are tasks supported on the Dimensions page for Custom Planning applications, making them the correct answers.

In Oracle Planning 2024’s module-based Planning, including the Financials module, the time frame (e.g., years) and granularity (e.g., months, weeks) for plans and forecasts are configured to define the planning horizon and periodicity. For Financials, this configuration occurs in:

A. Planning and Forecast Preparation: Correct. This component is where administrators define the time frame (e.g., start year, number of years) and granularity (e.g., monthly, weekly) for plans and forecasts. It’s a mandatory configuration task executed via the Configure card, allowing module-specific settings.

B. Manage Time Periods: Incorrect. This is not a standard component in Oracle Planning for setting time frame and granularity; it’s a term more aligned with other Oracle systems (e.g., Essbase) or custom period management, not Financials configuration.

C. Seasonality Management: Incorrect. Seasonality Management deals with distributing data across periods based on patterns (e.g., seasonal trends), not setting the overall time frame or granularity.

D. Valid Intersections: Incorrect. Valid Intersections define allowable data combinations across dimensions, not the time frame or granularity of plans.

The Oracle documentation specifies that Planning and Forecast Preparation is the component where time-related settings are established for Financials, making A the correct answer.

In Oracle Planning 2024, integrating detailed Workforce data (such as salary, benefits, and taxes) into Financials involves leveraging out-of-the-box integration features like data maps and Smart Push. To override expense lines in Financials with more detailed values stored in Workforce, the correct approach is to define how Workforce accounts roll up into Financials accounts using the "Financial Statement Integration" data map. This process involves mapping specific Workforce accounts (e.g., payroll taxes, total salary) to corresponding Financials accounts and then synchronizing and pushing the data to update Financials with the detailed values.

Option A is the verified answer because it directly addresses the initial setup required to move detailed Workforce values into Financials by defining the rollup mappings in the Financial Statement Integration data map. After this mapping is configured, administrators can synchronize and push the data to reflect the detailed values in Financials reporting. Option B is incorrect because the Financials Integration Summary form is used to view rolled-up data, not to calculate compensation data for updating underlying Workforce details—this is a Workforce-specific task, not a data movement step. Option C is also incorrect, as there is no "Rollup business rule" explicitly mentioned in the Financials Integration Summary form’s Actions menu for this purpose; instead, rollup occurs via data maps. Option D, while related to Compensation Data synchronization, is a narrower action that does not fully address the broader task of moving detailed Workforce values into Financials expense lines, which requires the Financial Statement Integration data map.

The Oracle Planning 2024 Implementation documentation highlights that Financials integrates with Workforce using predefined data maps, such as Financial Statement Integration, to roll up detailed employee expenses into financial reporting, making Option A the most accurate and complete step for this scenario.

In Oracle Planning 2024, data maps with Smart Push or manual execution can push various types of data between cubes within the same application or across applications. However, not all items can be transferred. The item that cannot be pushed is:

A. Comments: Incorrect. Comments (cell-level annotations) can be pushed between cubes using data maps, provided the mappings include the necessary dimensions.

B. Attachments: Incorrect. Attachments linked to data cells can be transferred via data maps, as long as the target cube supports them and the mapping is configured correctly.

C. Data change history: Correct. Data change history (audit trails tracking who changed what and when) is not transferable via data maps. It is metadata tied to the source cube’s audit log, not a pushable data element.

D. Supporting detail: Incorrect. Supporting detail (breakdowns of aggregated values) can be pushed between cubes if the target cube is configured to accept it and the mapping includes it.

The Oracle documentation specifies that data change history is excluded from data map transfers, as it’s a system-maintained log, not a user-editable or movable data type, making C the correct answer.

When designing a report in Reports for Oracle Enterprise Performance Management Cloud and encountering an error (indicated by a red bar above the report header), the issue often stems from report object configuration. The two possible causes are:

A. The report name is blank when you use a text function to display the name: Incorrect. A blank report name might cause display issues, but it’s not a common cause of a report object error flagged by a red bar—errors typically relate to objects or data sources, not naming.

B. The report object overlaps with another report object: Correct. Overlapping objects (e.g., grids, charts) can cause rendering or validation errors in Report Designer, triggering an error indicator like a red bar due to layout conflicts.

C. The data source connection for the report is no longer valid: Correct. If the data source (e.g., a cube or grid definition) becomes invalid (e.g., deleted, renamed, or inaccessible), the report cannot retrieve data, resulting in an error marked by a red bar.

D. The size of the inserted graphic is too large: Incorrect. While large graphics might affect performance or formatting, they do not typically cause a report object error flagged by a red bar—size issues are more likely to impact display than functionality.

The Oracle documentation identifies B (object overlap) and C (invalid data source) as frequent causes of errors in Report Designer, making them the correct answers.