Secure-Software-Design Exam Dumps - WGU Secure Software Design (D487, KEO1) Exam

Option D best addresses security change management, here's why:

Focus on Change: The question directly asks about a modification to how remote administration is secured. This aligns with the core goal of security change management, which is to evaluate and control the security implications of changes to systems.

Security-Specific: The question is explicitly concerned with security, not general functionality or requirements.

Practical Aspect: Remote administration access is a frequent target for attackers, making it a common area for security change management scrutiny.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The scenario described indicates that the system was subjected to inputs containing random data and some structured query language (SQL) statements, leading to an exponential increase in test data. This behavior is characteristic of fuzzing, a testing technique used to identify vulnerabilities by inputting a wide range of random or unexpected data into the system.

Fuzzing aims to discover coding errors and security loopholes by bombarding the application with malformed or unexpected inputs, observing how the system responds. The presence of random characters and SQL statements suggests that the fuzzing tool was testing for vulnerabilities such as SQL injection by injecting various payloads into the system.

This approach is part of the Verification business function in the OWASP SAMM, specifically within the Security Testing practice. Security testing involves evaluating the software to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited, and fuzzing is a common technique employed in this practice to ensure the robustness and security of the application.

Manual code review is a type of security analysis that requires a significant time investment from a highly skilled team member. This process involves a detailed and thorough examination of the source code to identify security vulnerabilities that automated tools might miss. It is labor-intensive because it relies on the expertise of the reviewer to understand the context, logic, and potential security implications of the code. Unlike automated methods like static or dynamic code analysis, manual code review demands a deep understanding of the codebase, which can be time-consuming and requires a high level of skill and experience.

Modifying the source code is typically associated with the patch management step in the change management process. Patch management involves the acquisition, testing, and installation of code changes, which can include updates, bug fixes, or improvements to existing software. This step ensures that modifications to the software are made in a controlled and systematic manner, maintaining the integrity and security of the software throughout the change.