Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Exam Dumps - Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud Security Engineer

To maintain proper security policies across numerous Google Cloud environments, especially with a large developer base and a small security team, it's crucial to implement automated and scalable security measures.​

Option A: While applying AI-recommended security posture templates can be beneficial, as of now, there isn't a specific predefined template for Gemini in Vertex AI within the Security Command Center.​

Option B: Publishing internal policies and guidelines is essential for promoting secure development practices but may not be sufficient alone to enforce or detect security policies.​

Option C: Implementing the principle of least privilege through Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles minimizes the risk of misconfigurations and unauthorized access by ensuring users have only the permissions necessary for their tasks.​

Option D: Applying organization policy constraints enforces specific configurations and restrictions across projects. Utilizing Security Health Analytics helps in detecting and monitoring deviations from these policies, providing automated insights into potential security issues.​

Option E: Using Cloud Logging to detect misconfigurations and triggering Cloud Run functions for remediation introduces complexity and may require significant maintenance, making it less practical for a small security team.​

Therefore, Options C and D are the most effective strategies. They provide automated enforcement and monitoring of security policies, aligning with the need for scalable solutions given the organization's size and resources.​

To implement a Zero Trust architecture that evaluates device posture (OS version, encryption, etc.) for access to data in Cloud Storage, you must use Context-Aware Access (CAA). CAA relies on Access Context Manager to define "Access Levels" and VPC Service Controls (VPC-SC) to enforce those levels for managed services like Cloud Storage.

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Context-Aware Access with VPC Service Controls):

"VPC Service Controls can use Access Context Manager access levels to restrict access based on a variety of attributes, including user identity, device security status (device policy), and IP address.2 By applying an access level to a service perimeter, you can ensure that only requests meeting those specific contextual requirements can access the resources within that perimeter."

Implementation Steps:

Access Context Manager: Create an access level that checks for device management status, minimum OS version, and other posture requirements (verified by the Chrome Enterprise/Endpoint Verification agent).

VPC Service Controls: Create a service perimeter around the project containing the Cloud Storage buckets.

Policy Binding: Associate the Access Level with the VPC-SC perimeter. Any request that doesn't meet the device policy (e.g., outdated OS) will be blocked at the API layer, even if the user has the correct IAM roles.

https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/firewalls#service-accounts-vs-tags

https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/firewalls#service-accounts-vs-tags

A service account represents an identity associated with an instance. Only one service account can be associated with an instance. You control access to the service account by controlling the grant of the Service Account User role for other IAM principals. For an IAM principal to start an instance by using a service account, that principal must have the Service Account User role to at least use that service account and appropriate permissions to create instances (for example, having the Compute Engine Instance Admin role to the project).

To comply with FIPS 140-2 for the messaging app, you need to ensure that both data at rest and data in transit are encrypted according to the standard. Using customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) ensures that you have control over the encryption keys, and BoringSSL is a library that meets FIPS 140-2 standards for encrypting data in transit.

Steps:

Encrypt Local SSDs: Modify the instance template for the Managed Instance Group (MIG) to use customer-managed encryption keys (CMEK) for encrypting Local SSDs.

Enable BoringSSL: Update the application to use the BoringSSL library for all instance-to-instance communication to ensure that all data in transit is encrypted according to FIPS 140-2 standards.

To ensure least-privilege access and provide necessary permissions to the DevOps team only during a deployment issue, follow these steps:

Create a Service Account:

In your Google Cloud project, create a new service account specifically for the DevOps team.

Assign Limited Permissions:

Grant the service account permissions with only the necessary list/view roles. For instance, you can create a custom IAM role with compute.instances.list and compute.instances.get permissions.

Grant Service Account User Role:

Assign the Service Account User role to the DevOps team members for the created service account. This allows them to act as the service account and use its permissions.

Access Control During Incidents:

During a deployment issue, the DevOps team can temporarily use the service account to access the resources. This ensures they have the least-privilege access required to investigate and resolve the issue.

Automation and Monitoring:

Implement automation to enable and disable the service account access as needed and monitor the usage to ensure compliance with the least-privilege principle.

Benefits:

Security: Limits access to only what is necessary, reducing the risk of unauthorized changes.

Flexibility: Provides necessary access during incidents without granting permanent elevated permissions.

References

Creating and Managing Service Accounts

Service Account User Role

The problem requires ensuring that only images that have passed vulnerability scanning and meet corporate policies are allowed to be deployed to GKE, with the process being automated and integrated into the existing CI/CD pipeline.

Binary Authorization: This Google Cloud service is purpose-built to enforce deployment policies on images before they are run on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Run, and other deployable platforms. It acts as a policy gate that prevents the deployment of non-compliant images.

Extract Reference: "Binary Authorization is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Run, and Anthos clusters." and "With Binary Authorization, you can require images to be signed by trusted authorities and enforce validation policies during deployment." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Binary Authorization overview" - https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/overview)

Artifact Analysis (part of Container Analysis): Artifact Analysis (which includes Container Analysis) provides vulnerability scanning capabilities for container images stored in Artifact Registry. It generates findings and metadata about vulnerabilities.

Extract Reference: "Container Analysis is a service that scans your images for known vulnerabilities and provides metadata about them." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Overview | Container Analysis" - https://cloud.google.com/container-analysis/docs/overview)

Binary Authorization can be configured to integrate with Artifact Analysis (or other attestors) to check for vulnerability scan results as part of its deployment policy.

Integration and Automation: Binary Authorization policies can require attestations before deployment. An attestation confirms that an image meets specific criteria (e.g., it has passed a vulnerability scan, it was signed by an approved CI/CD process, it adheres to corporate policies). Cloud Build can be configured to generate these attestations after a successful vulnerability scan (using Artifact Analysis). This fully automates the process and integrates directly into the CI/CD pipeline.

Extract Reference: "With Binary Authorization, you create a policy that enforces your requirements. The policy defines rules that govern deployment. For example, a policy can require all images to be signed by a trusted authority before deployment." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Binary Authorization overview" - https://cloud.google.com/binary-authorization/docs/overview)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Custom script in Cloud Build... Fail the build: While scanning during the build is good practice (shift-left security), failing the build only prevents the image from being pushed. It doesn't prevent a developer or an automated process from manually deploying an old or non-compliant image that might already exist in Artifact Registry, or from bypassing the build system. The enforcement needs to happen at deployment time.

B. Configure GKE to use only images from a specific... trusted Artifact Registry repository. Manually inspect all images: Manually inspecting images is not automated and does not scale for a "large number of containerized applications." It also doesn't programmatically enforce vulnerability scan results or corporate policies.

D. Enable Artifact Analysis vulnerability scanning and regularly scan images... Remove any images that do not meet... before deployment: This describes scanning and remediation, which are important. However, it's a reactive approach ("remove any images") rather than a proactive enforcement ("only images that... are allowed to be deployed"). There's still a window where a non-compliant image could be deployed before it's removed. Binary Authorization is the enforcement gate.

Therefore, configuring Binary Authorization with a policy that integrates with Artifact Analysis (or requires attestations based on its findings) is the most robust, automated, and Google-recommended solution for enforcing deployment policies based on vulnerability scanning and corporate compliance.

https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/docs/organization-policy/org-policy-constraints - constraints/compute.trustedImageProjects

This list constraint defines the set of projects that can be used for image storage and disk instantiation for Compute Engine. If this constraint is active, only images from trusted projects will be allowed as the source for boot disks for new instances.