PCNSE Exam Dumps - Palo Alto Networks Certified Security Engineer (PCNSE) PAN-OS 11.0

Based on PAN-OS 11.0 documentation, the forwarding configuration for specific log types in Device > Log Settings involves selecting log types for system-level logs, which include HIP Match and Configuration logs.

Explanation for Each Option

A. Threat

Threat logs record detected security threats such as malware, viruses, and vulnerabilities.

Forwarding of Threat logs is not configured in Device > Log Settings. Instead, Threat logs are forwarded using Log Forwarding Profiles applied to Security Policies.

Verdict: Incorrect.

B. HIP Match

HIP Match logs capture information about endpoint compliance reported by GlobalProtect clients.

These logs can be configured for forwarding in Device > Log Settings for monitoring and compliance purposes.

Verdict: Correct.

C. Traffic

Traffic logs provide details about allowed or denied network traffic.

Forwarding of Traffic logs is configured using Log Forwarding Profiles applied to Security Policies, not in Device > Log Settings.

Verdict: Incorrect.

D. Configuration

Configuration logs track administrative changes to the firewall, such as updates to policies, settings, and objects.

These logs can be forwarded from Device > Log Settings for auditing purposes.

Verdict: Correct.

Correct Answer

B. HIP Match

D. Configuration

Key Points from PAN-OS 11.0 Documentation

Device > Log Settings is specifically for system-related logs like HIP Match and Configuration.

Logs like Threat and Traffic are handled through Log Forwarding Profiles applied to Security or NAT policies.

Documentation Reference

For further details, refer to the official Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 11.0 Admin Guide under Device > Log Settings. This section outlines which log types can be forwarded from this menu.

Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS) ensures unique session keys per VPN session, enabled under the IKE Gateway advanced options (Option A) by selecting a Diffie-Hellman (DH) group. This resolves Phase 2 mismatches if the peer requires PFS.

Option B (IPsec Tunnel) doesn’t directly control PFS. Option C (DH Group in IPsec Crypto) is related but not the enablement point. Option D (authentication algorithm) is unrelated. Documentation specifies IKE Gateway for PFS.

https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000ClG2CAK

When deploying User-ID in environments with diverse directory services, Palo Alto Networks firewalls have the capability to monitor several types of servers to gather user mapping information. Among the options provided:

C. Red Hat Linux, Microsoft Active Directory, and Microsoft Exchange:

Red Hat Linux: Palo Alto Networks User-ID can monitor Linux systems to gather user information, typically by integrating with services like syslog or by using an agent that reads user login events.

Microsoft Active Directory: This is one of the most common sources for User-ID, as Active Directory is widely used for user management and authentication. User-ID can directly integrate with Active Directory to read security event logs, capturing user login and logout events.

Microsoft Exchange: While not directly monitored for user login events, Microsoft Exchange can be a source of IP-to-user mapping information, especially for users accessing email services. This can be achieved by parsing Exchange logs for client access information.

These platforms can provide valuable data for User-ID, enabling the firewall to apply policies based on user identity across diverse network environments.

https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/panorama/9-1/panorama-admin/panorama-overview/centralized-firewall-configuration-and-update-management/device-groups/device-group-hierarchy

When an administrator needs to evaluate recent policy changes that were committed and pushed to a firewall device group in Panorama, the most direct approach is to use the "Preview Changes" feature.

A. Click Preview Changes under Push Scope:

The "Preview Changes" option is available under the "Push Scope" in Panorama. This feature allows administrators to see a detailed comparison of the changes that are about to be pushed to the managed firewalls or that have been recently pushed. It highlights the differences between the current configuration and the previous one, making it easier to identify exactly what changes were made, including modifications to policies, objects, and other settings.

This is particularly useful for auditing and verifying that the intended changes match the actual changes being deployed, enhancing transparency and reducing the risk of unintended configuration modifications.

This approach provides a clear and concise way to review configuration changes before and after they are applied, ensuring that policy modifications are intentional and accurately reflect the administrator's objectives.

https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-web-interface-help/policies/policies-application-override

https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000PPDrCAO