OGEA-103 Exam Dumps - TOGAF Enterprise Architecture Combined Part 1 and Part 2 Exam

Risk is defined as the effect of uncertainty on objectives, according to the ISO 31000 standard, which provides principles and guidelines for risk management1 Risk can be positive or negative, depending on whether the uncertainty affects the achievement or the failure of the objectives. Risk can also be expressed in terms of likelihood and impact, which indicate the probability and the consequence of the risk occurrence. Risk management is the coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with regard to risk. Risk management is an integral part of the TOGAF standard, as it helps to identify, assess, and treat the risks that may affect the architecture development and implementation2 References: 1: ISO 31000:2018, Riskmanagement — Guidelines, Clause 3.1 2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 32: Risk Management

Ensuring compliance with internal and external standards and regulatory obligations is one of the activities included as part of Architecture Governance. Architecture Governance is the practice and orientation by which enterprise architectures and other architectures are managed and controlled at an enterprise-wide level. It involves establishing processes, roles, responsibilities, policies, and standards to ensure that architectures are aligned with the enterprise’s strategy and objectives, and meet the quality and performance requirements. Reference: The TOGAF® Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 3.3.6 Architecture Governance.

 In Phase E of the ADM cycle, building block gaps become associated with work packages that will address the gaps. This phase involves creating an Implementation and Migration Plan that defines a set of work packages and Transition Architectures that will deliver the Target Architecture. Reference: The TOGAF® Standard | The Open Group Website, Section 3.2.5 Phase E: OpportunitiesandSolutions.

The description provided aligns with Phase F: Migration Planning in the TOGAF ADM. This phase focuses on finalizing and implementing the projects necessary to reach the adjusted target state.

Phase F Objective:

Ensures projects and work packages are well-defined and align with stakeholder priorities.

Translates architecture changes into actionable implementation projects.

Assesses risk, value, and effort in implementation.

Establishes the Implementation and Migration Plan.

Key Outputs of Phase F:

Architecture Roadmap (Updated)

Implementation and Migration Plan

Governance Model for Change Implementation

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Phase E: OpportunitiesandSolutions): Focuses on defining projects and high-level solutions, but does not complete their implementation planning.

Option B (Phase A: Architecture Vision): Establishes high-level goals but does not involve migration planning.

Option C (Phase G: Implementation Governance): Ensures the execution aligns with architecture, but does not define projects for migration.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation from Expert in Enterprise Architecture, guiding in TOGAF and ArchiMate:

The TOGAF Content Framework provides a structured model for architecture outputs, defining:

Deliverables

Artifacts

Building Blocks

Relationships between architectural content across domains

Its primary intent is to ensure that architecture work produced through the ADM is consistent, complete, and reusable, regardless of the project, team, or iteration.

Why Option A is correct:

The Content Framework exists to drive consistency and standardization of architecture outputs when applying the ADM, enabling comparability, governance, and reuse across the enterprise.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. To prevent gaps in the target architecture deliverable set: Gap avoidance is a benefit, but not the main stated purpose.

C. To store the artifacts identified in the Architecture Repository: Storage is the role of the Architecture Repository, not the Content Framework.

D. To address IT system concerns relevant to an enterprise: This is too narrow and ignores business, data, and application domains.

Authoritative TOGAF References:

TOGAF Architecture Content Framework

TOGAF ADM Deliverables and Artifacts

TOGAF Architecture Repository

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation from Expert in Enterprise Architecture, guiding in TOGAF and ArchiMate:

To answer this question correctly, it is necessary to identify the TOGAF-defined deliverables:

Deliverable 3 is the Request for Architecture Work. This document is formally issued by the sponsoring organization to the architecture function to initiate a new ADM cycle or iteration.

Deliverable 4 corresponds to Architecture Requirements, which are expressed as quantitative, testable statements that implementation projects must satisfy to claim architectural compliance.

Why Option A is correct:

The Request for Architecture Work is a key output of Phase A (Architecture Vision). Phase A formally initiates the ADM cycle, establishes scope, stakeholders, constraints, and secures approval to proceed.

Architecture Requirements form a critical input to Architecture Governance, specifically contributing to the plan for how the architecture is governed, including compliance assessments, checkpoints, and governance controls during implementation.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. Phase A, an assessment of the changes to the architecture: Impact and change assessments are not the primary formation purpose of Architecture Requirements.

C. the Preliminary Phase, an approach to change for the Implementation and Migration Plan: The Request for Architecture Work is not produced in the Preliminary Phase; that phase focuses on establishing Architecture Capability.

D. the Preliminary Phase, a major component of an implementation project: Architecture Requirements guide implementation but are not classified as a “major component” of the project itself.

Authoritative TOGAF References:

TOGAF ADM Phase A – Architecture Vision (Request for Architecture Work)

TOGAF Architecture Requirements Management

TOGAF Architecture Governance Framework

============

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation from Expert in Enterprise Architecture, guiding in TOGAF and ArchiMate:

Architecture Partitioning is a technique supported by TOGAF to manage complexity and scale, especially in large enterprises.

Correct statements:

Statement 2 is correct: Partitioning enables parallel work by multiple teams on different parts of the architecture.

Statement 3 is correct: Partitioning supports architecture re-use by isolating common or shared components.

Why Statement 1 is incorrect:

TOGAF does not mandate a partitioning model. It supports and recommends partitioning where appropriate, but it is not a required element of the ADM.

============

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation from Expert in Enterprise Architecture, guiding in TOGAF and ArchiMate:

TOGAF adopts a formal risk management perspective aligned with widely accepted enterprise risk management practices. Within the ADM, risks are identified, analyzed, treated, and monitored throughout all phases, particularly during Architecture Governance and Implementation Governance.

TOGAF explicitly distinguishes between:

Initial Risk:The level of risk identified before any mitigation actions are applied. This represents the inherent exposure associated with an architecture decision, solution, or implementation approach.

Residual Risk:The level of risk that remains after mitigation measures have been applied. This residual risk must be explicitly accepted, monitored, or further treated by governance bodies.

Why Option D is correct:

TOGAF requires both Initial and Residual risks to be documented and monitored to ensure informed decision-making and effective governance throughout the ADM lifecycle.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Technical and Financial level: These are categories of risk, not the two monitoring levels defined by TOGAF.

B. Mitigated and Revised level: These terms are not used as formal risk levels in TOGAF.

C. Operational and Strategic level: These describe business risk domains, not TOGAF-defined monitoring levels.

Authoritative TOGAF References:

TOGAF Risk Management

TOGAF Architecture Governance

TOGAF ADM Guidelines and Techniques – Risk Management

============