C_ABAPD_2507 Exam Dumps - SAP Certified Associate - Back-End Developer - ABAP Cloud

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

A → Recommended to define attributes for message placeholders.

C → Inheriting from cx_static_check enforces compile-time checks to ensure exceptions are handled.

E → Implementing if_t100_message allows integration with message classes.

B → Misleading, design-time warning is about handling, not raising.

D → Not a recommended practice in ABAP Cloud (system classes are not extendable).

Study Guide Reference: ABAP Objects Guide – Defining Exception Classes.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

ABAP Cloud rules are enforced by:

ABAP Compiler → performs syntax checks against ABAP Cloud rules.

ABAP Runtime Checks → ensure runtime compliance with rules (e.g., avoiding calls to unreleased APIs).

Release contracts and platform reuse services are enablers but do not enforce rules automatically.

Verified Study Guide Reference: ABAP Cloud Documentation – Rule Enforcement via Compiler and Runtime.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Let’s evaluate each field:

field1: Defined as REFERENCE TO abap.clnt(3) — this is correct. It follows standard definition for client fields.

field2: Defined as abap.char(1332) — this is incorrect. In ABAP CDS view entities, the maximum length for CHAR fields is limited to 1333 bytes total row size for all fields in a view or table. A single CHAR(1332) is almost the full limit and considered impractical or invalid in real implementations.

field3: Defined as abap.quan(2) — this is correct, representing a quantity field with 2 decimal places.

field4: Defined as abap.unit(2) — this is correct and compatible with the @Semantics.quantity.unitOfMeasure annotation used in field3.

Therefore, field2 is the invalid field due to its excessive length, likely breaching the allowable memory layout in the HANA table or violating SAP CDS limits.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Interactive runs from the tested object or its test class in ADT: In RAP/ABAP Cloud test guides, you specify a test relation, which then lets you run unit tests directly from the context menu of the behavior definition (tested object) in ADT. This is the “Run as unit test” interaction from the tested object.

Interactive runs from the test class itself: Test classes are declared with FOR TESTING, and the same RAP guides show the canonical test-class structure used for ABAP Unit. In ADT, you can execute the test class via its context menu (“Run as Unit Test”).

Mass execution with ATC: The same document set prescribes governance via ABAP Test Cockpit (ATC) check variants applied across many objects, supporting mass test/check execution. ATC is used broadly to enforce ABAP Cloud rules and quality gates across developments, which covers running checks/tests at scale (mass).

There is no built-in mechanism to execute unit tests during transport release; the recommended mass execution path is via ATC, not via the Transport Organizer. (Hence B and E are not correct.)

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

SAP recommends using CDS view entities over classic CDS DDIC-based views due to the following benefits:

Simpler and stricter syntax: CDS view entities enforce a clearer separation of concerns and reduce ambiguity, which helps ensure consistency across the stack. This makes Option C correct.

Elimination of the need for a database view: With CDS view entities, there's no dependency on a separate DDIC SQL view object, reducing redundancy and improving activation performance. This makes Option D correct.

Incorrect options:

Automated client handling (Option A) is supported in both CDS view entities and classic CDS views via annotations like @ClientHandling.

Simplified syntax check (Option B) is not a distinct feature of CDS view entities. Syntax checking is part of ABAP Development Tools regardless of the CDS flavor used.