What HPE7-A02 Questions and Answers feature?

The benefit of the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) is that it allows a device to query whether a single certificate is revoked or not. OCSP provides a real-time mechanism for checking the revocation status of an individual certificate, enabling devices to verify the validity of certificates quickly and efficiently.

1.Certificate Status Query: OCSP enables devices to send a query to an OCSP responder to check the revocation status of a specific certificate.

2.Real-Time Verification: This protocol offers real-time responses, ensuring that the most up-to-date status of the certificate is obtained.

3.Efficiency: OCSP is more efficient than downloading an entire Certificate Revocation List (CRL), as it only queries the status of one certificate at a time.

In HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI), the clusters shown in the exhibit represent groups of unclassified devices that CPDI's machine learning algorithms have identified as having similar attributes. These clusters are formed based on observed characteristics and behaviors of the devices, helping administrators to categorize and manage devices more effectively.

1.Machine Learning: CPDI uses machine learning to analyze device attributes and group them into clusters based on similarities.

2.Unclassified Devices: These clusters typically represent devices that have not yet been explicitly classified by admins but share common attributes that suggest they belong to the same category.

3.Management: This clustering helps in simplifying the process of managing and applying policies to groups of similar devices.

Rogue AP Containment Methods:

HPE Aruba Networking recommends using wireless deauthentication as the preferred method for rogue AP containment.

Deauthentication sends deauth frames to clients connected to rogue APs, causing them to disconnect. This method is effective without introducing unnecessary disruptions to the wired infrastructure.

Key Points:

Wireless Deauthentication is simple, efficient, and widely supported across client devices.

Tarpit Containment is more aggressive and may cause unintentional disruptions to legitimate clients.

Wired Containment involves blocking traffic at the switch level but is complex and may impact legitimate infrastructure traffic.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correct. Wireless deauthentication is the recommended method as it targets rogue AP clients without excessive network impact.

Option B: Incorrect. Combining wireless tarpit and wired containment is overkill and not typically recommended.

Option C: Incorrect. Wireless tarpit can be effective but is generally not the first choice due to its aggressive nature.

Option D: Incorrect. Wired containment is more complex and reserved for specific use cases, not general recommendations.