1z0-1127-25 Exam Dumps - Oracle Cloud Infrastructure 2025 Generative AI Professional

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

T-Few fine-tuning enhances efficiency by updating only a small subset of transformer layers or parameters (e.g., via adapters), reducing computational load—Option D is correct. Option A (adding layers) increases complexity, not efficiency. Option B (all layers) describes Vanilla fine-tuning. Option C (excluding layers) is false—T-Few updates, not excludes. This selective approach optimizes resource use.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely details T-Few under PEFT methods.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

T-Few, a Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method, uses annotated (labeled) data to selectively update a small fraction of model weights, optimizing efficiency—Option A is correct. Option B is false—manual annotation isn’t required; the data just needs labels. Option C (all layers) describes Vanilla fine-tuning, not T-Few. Option D (unsupervised) is incorrect—T-Few typically uses supervised, annotated data. Annotation supports targeted updates.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely details T-Few’s data requirements under fine-tuning processes.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Embeddings in NLP are dense, numerical vectors that represent words, phrases, or sentences in a way that captures their semantic meaning and relationships (e.g., "king" and "queen" being close in vector space). This enables models to process text mathematically, making Option C correct. Option A is false, as embeddings simplify processing, not increase complexity. Option B relates to translation, not embeddings’ primary purpose. Option D is incorrect, as embeddings aren’t primarily for compression but for representation.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely covers embeddings under data preprocessing or vector databases.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

PEFT (e.g., LoRA, T-Few) updates a small subset of parameters (often new ones) using labeled, task-specific data, unlike classic fine-tuning, which updates all parameters—Option A is correct. Option B reverses PEFT’s efficiency. Option C (no modification) fits soft prompting, not all PEFT. Option D (all parameters) mimics classic fine-tuning. PEFT reduces resource demands.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely contrasts PEFT and fine-tuning under customization methods.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

String prompt templates (e.g., in LangChain) are flexible frameworks that can include zero, one, or multiple variables (placeholders) to customize prompts dynamically. They can be static (no variables) or complex (many variables), making Option C correct. Option A is too restrictive. Option B is false—variables are a core feature. Option D is incorrect, as no minimum is required. This flexibility aids prompt engineering.

OCI 2025 Generative AI documentation likely covers prompt templates under LangChain or prompt design.